Alien tutelage: on generalizability and contextualization in leadership development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There has been sustained argument for contextualization of leadership development, none more so than when working with Indigenous and other marginalized peoples. Leadership development programmes are predominantly conducted by `outsider? educationalists and consultants and the question of contextualization, of how much or how little, is a decision that is ultimately made in classrooms around the world under conditions of alien tutelage. Employing an autoethnographic approach, the article examines three examples of leadership development programmes in order to think about generalization and/or contextualization. Overall, this study finds that arguments for and against `generalizability? and `contextualization? might depend more on the skill and experience of the teacher rather than the corpus of knowledge over which so many battles are fought. It suggests that the potential embedded in generalizable programmes can be realized if there is sufficient pedagogic engagement and space created by culturally competent teachers and facilitators for local testing of generalized knowledge claims for their adaptation: personally, organizationally, nationally and globally. It also finds that the people and outcome focus aspects of leadership development seem to be more influenced by culture than other aspects such as personal leadership style preference that would appear to transcend ethic cultural background.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346 - 356
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Resource Development International
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

@article{e849c74580d147a18455fe08e40545fd,
title = "Alien tutelage: on generalizability and contextualization in leadership development",
abstract = "There has been sustained argument for contextualization of leadership development, none more so than when working with Indigenous and other marginalized peoples. Leadership development programmes are predominantly conducted by `outsider? educationalists and consultants and the question of contextualization, of how much or how little, is a decision that is ultimately made in classrooms around the world under conditions of alien tutelage. Employing an autoethnographic approach, the article examines three examples of leadership development programmes in order to think about generalization and/or contextualization. Overall, this study finds that arguments for and against `generalizability? and `contextualization? might depend more on the skill and experience of the teacher rather than the corpus of knowledge over which so many battles are fought. It suggests that the potential embedded in generalizable programmes can be realized if there is sufficient pedagogic engagement and space created by culturally competent teachers and facilitators for local testing of generalized knowledge claims for their adaptation: personally, organizationally, nationally and globally. It also finds that the people and outcome focus aspects of leadership development seem to be more influenced by culture than other aspects such as personal leadership style preference that would appear to transcend ethic cultural background.",
author = "{Ma Rhea}, Zane",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/13678868.2012.756158",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "346 -- 356",
journal = "Human Resource Development International",
issn = "1469-8374",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Alien tutelage: on generalizability and contextualization in leadership development. / Ma Rhea, Zane.

In: Human Resource Development International, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2013, p. 346 - 356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alien tutelage: on generalizability and contextualization in leadership development

AU - Ma Rhea, Zane

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - There has been sustained argument for contextualization of leadership development, none more so than when working with Indigenous and other marginalized peoples. Leadership development programmes are predominantly conducted by `outsider? educationalists and consultants and the question of contextualization, of how much or how little, is a decision that is ultimately made in classrooms around the world under conditions of alien tutelage. Employing an autoethnographic approach, the article examines three examples of leadership development programmes in order to think about generalization and/or contextualization. Overall, this study finds that arguments for and against `generalizability? and `contextualization? might depend more on the skill and experience of the teacher rather than the corpus of knowledge over which so many battles are fought. It suggests that the potential embedded in generalizable programmes can be realized if there is sufficient pedagogic engagement and space created by culturally competent teachers and facilitators for local testing of generalized knowledge claims for their adaptation: personally, organizationally, nationally and globally. It also finds that the people and outcome focus aspects of leadership development seem to be more influenced by culture than other aspects such as personal leadership style preference that would appear to transcend ethic cultural background.

AB - There has been sustained argument for contextualization of leadership development, none more so than when working with Indigenous and other marginalized peoples. Leadership development programmes are predominantly conducted by `outsider? educationalists and consultants and the question of contextualization, of how much or how little, is a decision that is ultimately made in classrooms around the world under conditions of alien tutelage. Employing an autoethnographic approach, the article examines three examples of leadership development programmes in order to think about generalization and/or contextualization. Overall, this study finds that arguments for and against `generalizability? and `contextualization? might depend more on the skill and experience of the teacher rather than the corpus of knowledge over which so many battles are fought. It suggests that the potential embedded in generalizable programmes can be realized if there is sufficient pedagogic engagement and space created by culturally competent teachers and facilitators for local testing of generalized knowledge claims for their adaptation: personally, organizationally, nationally and globally. It also finds that the people and outcome focus aspects of leadership development seem to be more influenced by culture than other aspects such as personal leadership style preference that would appear to transcend ethic cultural background.

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1080/13678868.2012.756158

U2 - 10.1080/13678868.2012.756158

DO - 10.1080/13678868.2012.756158

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 346

EP - 356

JO - Human Resource Development International

JF - Human Resource Development International

SN - 1469-8374

IS - 3

ER -