Agreement between patients and nurses of neurobehavioral disability following stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation setting

Elissa L. O’Connell, David W. Lawson, Peter W. New, Renerus J. Stolwyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the level of agreement of neurobehavioral disability following stroke. Methods: Stroke patients and nurses were recruited from an inpatient neurorehabilitation facility. In total, 58 stroke patient–nurse pairs completed the St Andrew’s–Swansea Neurobehavioral Outcome Scale questionnaire. Results: Agreement levels of neurobehavioral disability varied across five behavior subdomains. Cognition and Interpersonal behaviors were reported as more prevalent according to nurses (39% and 36%) versus patients (14% and 7%). Agreement levels between the two groups was fair for these domains (ICC <0.60). Percentage category agreement methods revealed high patient–nurse agreement for Communication, Inhibition, and Aggression behaviors but overall reporting of these problems was very low or absent. Patient demographics and stroke variables did not predict the pattern of results. Lower patient–nurse agreement was moderately associated with older age (r s = 0.37, p = 0.01) and increased experience of nurse (r s = 0.38, p = 0.01) but only for the Cognition-related domain. Agreement of impact of neurobehavioral disability was none to slight for both groups across all neurobehavioral domains (κ <0.20). Conclusions: Neurobehavioral disability is common in the early recovery phase after stroke and is viewed differently with regards to frequency, type, and impact between patients and their nurses. Research and clinical training in the management of stroke-related neurobehavioral disability is required.Implications for rehabilitation Neurobehavioral disability (NBD) following stroke is commonly seen in the early stages of recovery and requires careful evaluation by stroke survivors and rehabilitation staff. Many patients may disagree with their clinician that they are exhibiting NBD, which may compromise the therapeutic relationship. We need to better understand factors underlying lower reporting of NBD by patients (denial or reduced self-awareness) to help guide management in stroke rehabilitation settings.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 29 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • behavior
  • cognition
  • inpatients
  • rehabilitation
  • Stroke

Cite this

@article{6b243fdff0774b279b6d6552dc21b395,
title = "Agreement between patients and nurses of neurobehavioral disability following stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation setting",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the level of agreement of neurobehavioral disability following stroke. Methods: Stroke patients and nurses were recruited from an inpatient neurorehabilitation facility. In total, 58 stroke patient–nurse pairs completed the St Andrew’s–Swansea Neurobehavioral Outcome Scale questionnaire. Results: Agreement levels of neurobehavioral disability varied across five behavior subdomains. Cognition and Interpersonal behaviors were reported as more prevalent according to nurses (39{\%} and 36{\%}) versus patients (14{\%} and 7{\%}). Agreement levels between the two groups was fair for these domains (ICC <0.60). Percentage category agreement methods revealed high patient–nurse agreement for Communication, Inhibition, and Aggression behaviors but overall reporting of these problems was very low or absent. Patient demographics and stroke variables did not predict the pattern of results. Lower patient–nurse agreement was moderately associated with older age (r s = 0.37, p = 0.01) and increased experience of nurse (r s = 0.38, p = 0.01) but only for the Cognition-related domain. Agreement of impact of neurobehavioral disability was none to slight for both groups across all neurobehavioral domains (κ <0.20). Conclusions: Neurobehavioral disability is common in the early recovery phase after stroke and is viewed differently with regards to frequency, type, and impact between patients and their nurses. Research and clinical training in the management of stroke-related neurobehavioral disability is required.Implications for rehabilitation Neurobehavioral disability (NBD) following stroke is commonly seen in the early stages of recovery and requires careful evaluation by stroke survivors and rehabilitation staff. Many patients may disagree with their clinician that they are exhibiting NBD, which may compromise the therapeutic relationship. We need to better understand factors underlying lower reporting of NBD by patients (denial or reduced self-awareness) to help guide management in stroke rehabilitation settings.",
keywords = "behavior, cognition, inpatients, rehabilitation, Stroke",
author = "O’Connell, {Elissa L.} and Lawson, {David W.} and New, {Peter W.} and Stolwyk, {Renerus J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/09638288.2019.1572792",
language = "English",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Agreement between patients and nurses of neurobehavioral disability following stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. / O’Connell, Elissa L.; Lawson, David W.; New, Peter W.; Stolwyk, Renerus J.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, 29.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement between patients and nurses of neurobehavioral disability following stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation setting

AU - O’Connell, Elissa L.

AU - Lawson, David W.

AU - New, Peter W.

AU - Stolwyk, Renerus J.

PY - 2019/3/29

Y1 - 2019/3/29

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the level of agreement of neurobehavioral disability following stroke. Methods: Stroke patients and nurses were recruited from an inpatient neurorehabilitation facility. In total, 58 stroke patient–nurse pairs completed the St Andrew’s–Swansea Neurobehavioral Outcome Scale questionnaire. Results: Agreement levels of neurobehavioral disability varied across five behavior subdomains. Cognition and Interpersonal behaviors were reported as more prevalent according to nurses (39% and 36%) versus patients (14% and 7%). Agreement levels between the two groups was fair for these domains (ICC <0.60). Percentage category agreement methods revealed high patient–nurse agreement for Communication, Inhibition, and Aggression behaviors but overall reporting of these problems was very low or absent. Patient demographics and stroke variables did not predict the pattern of results. Lower patient–nurse agreement was moderately associated with older age (r s = 0.37, p = 0.01) and increased experience of nurse (r s = 0.38, p = 0.01) but only for the Cognition-related domain. Agreement of impact of neurobehavioral disability was none to slight for both groups across all neurobehavioral domains (κ <0.20). Conclusions: Neurobehavioral disability is common in the early recovery phase after stroke and is viewed differently with regards to frequency, type, and impact between patients and their nurses. Research and clinical training in the management of stroke-related neurobehavioral disability is required.Implications for rehabilitation Neurobehavioral disability (NBD) following stroke is commonly seen in the early stages of recovery and requires careful evaluation by stroke survivors and rehabilitation staff. Many patients may disagree with their clinician that they are exhibiting NBD, which may compromise the therapeutic relationship. We need to better understand factors underlying lower reporting of NBD by patients (denial or reduced self-awareness) to help guide management in stroke rehabilitation settings.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the level of agreement of neurobehavioral disability following stroke. Methods: Stroke patients and nurses were recruited from an inpatient neurorehabilitation facility. In total, 58 stroke patient–nurse pairs completed the St Andrew’s–Swansea Neurobehavioral Outcome Scale questionnaire. Results: Agreement levels of neurobehavioral disability varied across five behavior subdomains. Cognition and Interpersonal behaviors were reported as more prevalent according to nurses (39% and 36%) versus patients (14% and 7%). Agreement levels between the two groups was fair for these domains (ICC <0.60). Percentage category agreement methods revealed high patient–nurse agreement for Communication, Inhibition, and Aggression behaviors but overall reporting of these problems was very low or absent. Patient demographics and stroke variables did not predict the pattern of results. Lower patient–nurse agreement was moderately associated with older age (r s = 0.37, p = 0.01) and increased experience of nurse (r s = 0.38, p = 0.01) but only for the Cognition-related domain. Agreement of impact of neurobehavioral disability was none to slight for both groups across all neurobehavioral domains (κ <0.20). Conclusions: Neurobehavioral disability is common in the early recovery phase after stroke and is viewed differently with regards to frequency, type, and impact between patients and their nurses. Research and clinical training in the management of stroke-related neurobehavioral disability is required.Implications for rehabilitation Neurobehavioral disability (NBD) following stroke is commonly seen in the early stages of recovery and requires careful evaluation by stroke survivors and rehabilitation staff. Many patients may disagree with their clinician that they are exhibiting NBD, which may compromise the therapeutic relationship. We need to better understand factors underlying lower reporting of NBD by patients (denial or reduced self-awareness) to help guide management in stroke rehabilitation settings.

KW - behavior

KW - cognition

KW - inpatients

KW - rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063751857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2019.1572792

DO - 10.1080/09638288.2019.1572792

M3 - Article

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

ER -