Age and Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management prior to Stroke: Linked Registry and General Practice Data

Introduction: There is limited evidence about the management of cardiovascular risk factors within 12 months before stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in Australian general practices. We evaluated whether age and sex disparities in cardiovascular risk factor management for primary prevention exist in general practice. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (2014.2018) linked with general practice data from three Primary Health Networks in Victoria, Australia. We included adults who had .2 encounters with a general practitioner within 12 months immediately before the first stroke/TIA. Cardiovascular risk factor management within 12 months before stroke/TIA was evaluated in terms of: assessment of risk factors (blood pressure [BP], serum lipids, blood glucose, body weight); prescription of prevention medications (BP-lowering, lipidlowering, glucose-lowering, antithrombotic agents); and attainment of risk factor targets. Results: Of 2,880 patients included (median age 76.5 years, 48.4% women), 80.9% were assessed for BP, 49.9% serum lipids, 46.8% blood glucose, and 39.3% body weight. Compared to patients aged 65.84 years, those aged <65 or ≥85 years were less often assessed for risk factors, with women aged .85 years assessed for significantly fewer risk factors than their male counterparts. The most prescribed prevention medications were BP-lowering (64.9%) and lipid-lowering agents (42.0%). There were significant sex differences among those aged <65 years (34.7% women vs. 40.2%men) and ≥85 years (34.0% women vs. 44.3% men) for lipid-lowering agents. Risk factor target attainment was generally poorer in men than women, especially among those aged <65 years. Conclusion: Age-sex disparity exists in risk factor.