Additive synergism between asbestos and smoking in lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuwadee Ngamwong, Wimonchat Tangamornsuksan, Ornrat Lohitnavy, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, C Norman Scholfield, Brad Reisfeld, Manupat Lohitnavy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    29 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Smoking and asbestos exposure are important risks for lung cancer. Several epidemiological studies have linked asbestos exposure and smoking to lung cancer. To reconcile and unify these results, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a quantitative estimate of the increased risk of lung cancer associated with asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking and to classify their interaction. Five electronic databases were searched from inception to May, 2015 for observational studies on lung cancer. All case-control (N = 10) and cohort (N = 7) studies were included in the analysis. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs) and 95 confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model for the association of asbestos exposure and smoking with lung cancer. Lung cancer patients who were not exposed to asbestos and non-smoking (A-S-) were compared with; (i) asbestos-exposed and non-smoking (A+S-), (ii) non-exposure to asbestos and smoking (A-S+), and (iii) asbestos-exposed and smoking (A+S+). Our meta-analysis showed a significant difference in risk of developing lung cancer among asbestos exposed and/or smoking workers compared to controls (A-S-), odds ratios for the disease (95 CI) were (i) 1.70 (A+S-, 1.31-2.21), (ii) 5.65; (A-S+, 3.38-9.42), (iii) 8.70 (A+S+, 5.8-13.10). The additive interaction index of synergy was 1.44 (95 CI = 1.26-1.77) and the multiplicative index = 0.91 (95 CI = 0.63-1.30). Corresponding values for cohort studies were 1.11 (95 CI = 1.00-1.28) and 0.51 (95 CI = 0.31-0.85). Our results point to an additive synergism for lung cancer with co-exposure of asbestos and cigarette smoking. Assessments of industrial health risks should take smoking and other airborne health risks when setting occupational asbestos exposure limits.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0135798.
    Number of pages19
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume10
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Cite this