Acquiescence Response Bias—Yeasaying and Higher Education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Acquiescence response bias is the tendency to agree to questionnaires irrespective of item content or direction, and is problematic for both researchers and clinicians. Further research is warranted to clarify factors relating to the confounding influence of acquiescence. Building on previous research that investigated the interaction between acquiescence, age, and secondary education, the current study has considered the role of adult higher educational achievement and acquiescence. Using the Big Five Inventory (BFI), acquiescence scores were calculated for a sample of 672 Australian adults (age M = 41.38, SD = 12.61). There was a significant inverse relationship between the variance in acquiescence scores and formal education. The greatest difference was found between the lowest education groups and the highest education groups, with the variance of the lower groups more than twice as large as the higher groups. The confounding influence of acquiescence was demonstrated using the BFI and targeted rotation to an ideal matrix, where worse model fit was found in the lower education group compared to the higher group. Implications for both researchers and clinicians are explored.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105 - 119
Number of pages15
JournalAustralian Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{0c291c0268cb4cd680312ba1f5f818c4,
title = "Acquiescence Response Bias—Yeasaying and Higher Education",
abstract = "Acquiescence response bias is the tendency to agree to questionnaires irrespective of item content or direction, and is problematic for both researchers and clinicians. Further research is warranted to clarify factors relating to the confounding influence of acquiescence. Building on previous research that investigated the interaction between acquiescence, age, and secondary education, the current study has considered the role of adult higher educational achievement and acquiescence. Using the Big Five Inventory (BFI), acquiescence scores were calculated for a sample of 672 Australian adults (age M = 41.38, SD = 12.61). There was a significant inverse relationship between the variance in acquiescence scores and formal education. The greatest difference was found between the lowest education groups and the highest education groups, with the variance of the lower groups more than twice as large as the higher groups. The confounding influence of acquiescence was demonstrated using the BFI and targeted rotation to an ideal matrix, where worse model fit was found in the lower education group compared to the higher group. Implications for both researchers and clinicians are explored.",
author = "Costello, {Shane Christopher} and John Roodenburg",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1017/edp.2015.11",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "105 -- 119",
journal = "The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist",
issn = "0816-5122",
publisher = "Australian Psychological Society",
number = "2",

}

Acquiescence Response Bias—Yeasaying and Higher Education. / Costello, Shane Christopher; Roodenburg, John.

In: Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2015, p. 105 - 119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acquiescence Response Bias—Yeasaying and Higher Education

AU - Costello, Shane Christopher

AU - Roodenburg, John

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Acquiescence response bias is the tendency to agree to questionnaires irrespective of item content or direction, and is problematic for both researchers and clinicians. Further research is warranted to clarify factors relating to the confounding influence of acquiescence. Building on previous research that investigated the interaction between acquiescence, age, and secondary education, the current study has considered the role of adult higher educational achievement and acquiescence. Using the Big Five Inventory (BFI), acquiescence scores were calculated for a sample of 672 Australian adults (age M = 41.38, SD = 12.61). There was a significant inverse relationship between the variance in acquiescence scores and formal education. The greatest difference was found between the lowest education groups and the highest education groups, with the variance of the lower groups more than twice as large as the higher groups. The confounding influence of acquiescence was demonstrated using the BFI and targeted rotation to an ideal matrix, where worse model fit was found in the lower education group compared to the higher group. Implications for both researchers and clinicians are explored.

AB - Acquiescence response bias is the tendency to agree to questionnaires irrespective of item content or direction, and is problematic for both researchers and clinicians. Further research is warranted to clarify factors relating to the confounding influence of acquiescence. Building on previous research that investigated the interaction between acquiescence, age, and secondary education, the current study has considered the role of adult higher educational achievement and acquiescence. Using the Big Five Inventory (BFI), acquiescence scores were calculated for a sample of 672 Australian adults (age M = 41.38, SD = 12.61). There was a significant inverse relationship between the variance in acquiescence scores and formal education. The greatest difference was found between the lowest education groups and the highest education groups, with the variance of the lower groups more than twice as large as the higher groups. The confounding influence of acquiescence was demonstrated using the BFI and targeted rotation to an ideal matrix, where worse model fit was found in the lower education group compared to the higher group. Implications for both researchers and clinicians are explored.

UR - http://goo.gl/nN4DAX

U2 - 10.1017/edp.2015.11

DO - 10.1017/edp.2015.11

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 105

EP - 119

JO - The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist

JF - The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist

SN - 0816-5122

IS - 2

ER -