Acoustic analysis of neonatal breath sounds using digital stethoscope technology

Lindsay Zhou, Faezeh Marzbanrad, Ashwin Ramanathan, Davood Fattahi, Pramodkumar Pharande, Atul Malhotra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is no published literature regarding the use of the digital stethoscope (DS) and computerized breath sound analysis in neonates, despite neonates experiencing a high burden of respiratory disease. We aimed to determine if the DS could be used to study breath sounds of term and preterm neonates without respiratory disease, and detect a difference in acoustic characteristics between them. Methods: A commercially available DS was used to record breath sounds of term and preterm neonates not receiving respiratory support between 24 and 48 hours after birth. Recordings were extracted, filtered, and computer analysis performed to obtain power spectra and mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) profiles. Results: Recordings from 26 term and 26 preterm infants were obtained. The preterm cohort had an average gestational age (median and interquartile range) of 32 (31-33) weeks and term 39 (38-39) weeks. Birth weight (mean and SD) was 1767 (411) g for the preterm and 3456 (442) g for the term cohort. Power spectra demonstrated the greatest power in the low-frequency range of 100 to 250 Hz for both groups. There were significant differences (P <.05) in the average power at low (100-250 Hz), medium (250-500 Hz), high (500-1000 Hz), and very high (1000-2000 Hz) frequency bands. MFCC profiles also demonstrated significant differences between groups (P <.05). Conclusion: It is feasible to use DS technology to analyze breath sounds in neonates. DS was able to determine significant differences between the acoustic characteristics of term and preterm infants breathing in room air. Further investigation of DS technology for neonatal breath sounds is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Pulmonology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 9 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • frequency
  • infant
  • lung
  • power
  • preterm
  • term

Cite this

Zhou, Lindsay ; Marzbanrad, Faezeh ; Ramanathan, Ashwin ; Fattahi, Davood ; Pharande, Pramodkumar ; Malhotra, Atul. / Acoustic analysis of neonatal breath sounds using digital stethoscope technology. In: Pediatric Pulmonology. 2020.
@article{9d36c4d5b53d4ecb88a2802a1dc90236,
title = "Acoustic analysis of neonatal breath sounds using digital stethoscope technology",
abstract = "Background: There is no published literature regarding the use of the digital stethoscope (DS) and computerized breath sound analysis in neonates, despite neonates experiencing a high burden of respiratory disease. We aimed to determine if the DS could be used to study breath sounds of term and preterm neonates without respiratory disease, and detect a difference in acoustic characteristics between them. Methods: A commercially available DS was used to record breath sounds of term and preterm neonates not receiving respiratory support between 24 and 48 hours after birth. Recordings were extracted, filtered, and computer analysis performed to obtain power spectra and mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) profiles. Results: Recordings from 26 term and 26 preterm infants were obtained. The preterm cohort had an average gestational age (median and interquartile range) of 32 (31-33) weeks and term 39 (38-39) weeks. Birth weight (mean and SD) was 1767 (411) g for the preterm and 3456 (442) g for the term cohort. Power spectra demonstrated the greatest power in the low-frequency range of 100 to 250 Hz for both groups. There were significant differences (P <.05) in the average power at low (100-250 Hz), medium (250-500 Hz), high (500-1000 Hz), and very high (1000-2000 Hz) frequency bands. MFCC profiles also demonstrated significant differences between groups (P <.05). Conclusion: It is feasible to use DS technology to analyze breath sounds in neonates. DS was able to determine significant differences between the acoustic characteristics of term and preterm infants breathing in room air. Further investigation of DS technology for neonatal breath sounds is warranted.",
keywords = "frequency, infant, lung, power, preterm, term",
author = "Lindsay Zhou and Faezeh Marzbanrad and Ashwin Ramanathan and Davood Fattahi and Pramodkumar Pharande and Atul Malhotra",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1002/ppul.24633",
language = "English",
journal = "Pediatric Pulmonology",
issn = "8755-6863",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Acoustic analysis of neonatal breath sounds using digital stethoscope technology. / Zhou, Lindsay; Marzbanrad, Faezeh; Ramanathan, Ashwin; Fattahi, Davood; Pharande, Pramodkumar; Malhotra, Atul.

In: Pediatric Pulmonology, 09.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acoustic analysis of neonatal breath sounds using digital stethoscope technology

AU - Zhou, Lindsay

AU - Marzbanrad, Faezeh

AU - Ramanathan, Ashwin

AU - Fattahi, Davood

AU - Pharande, Pramodkumar

AU - Malhotra, Atul

PY - 2020/1/9

Y1 - 2020/1/9

N2 - Background: There is no published literature regarding the use of the digital stethoscope (DS) and computerized breath sound analysis in neonates, despite neonates experiencing a high burden of respiratory disease. We aimed to determine if the DS could be used to study breath sounds of term and preterm neonates without respiratory disease, and detect a difference in acoustic characteristics between them. Methods: A commercially available DS was used to record breath sounds of term and preterm neonates not receiving respiratory support between 24 and 48 hours after birth. Recordings were extracted, filtered, and computer analysis performed to obtain power spectra and mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) profiles. Results: Recordings from 26 term and 26 preterm infants were obtained. The preterm cohort had an average gestational age (median and interquartile range) of 32 (31-33) weeks and term 39 (38-39) weeks. Birth weight (mean and SD) was 1767 (411) g for the preterm and 3456 (442) g for the term cohort. Power spectra demonstrated the greatest power in the low-frequency range of 100 to 250 Hz for both groups. There were significant differences (P <.05) in the average power at low (100-250 Hz), medium (250-500 Hz), high (500-1000 Hz), and very high (1000-2000 Hz) frequency bands. MFCC profiles also demonstrated significant differences between groups (P <.05). Conclusion: It is feasible to use DS technology to analyze breath sounds in neonates. DS was able to determine significant differences between the acoustic characteristics of term and preterm infants breathing in room air. Further investigation of DS technology for neonatal breath sounds is warranted.

AB - Background: There is no published literature regarding the use of the digital stethoscope (DS) and computerized breath sound analysis in neonates, despite neonates experiencing a high burden of respiratory disease. We aimed to determine if the DS could be used to study breath sounds of term and preterm neonates without respiratory disease, and detect a difference in acoustic characteristics between them. Methods: A commercially available DS was used to record breath sounds of term and preterm neonates not receiving respiratory support between 24 and 48 hours after birth. Recordings were extracted, filtered, and computer analysis performed to obtain power spectra and mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) profiles. Results: Recordings from 26 term and 26 preterm infants were obtained. The preterm cohort had an average gestational age (median and interquartile range) of 32 (31-33) weeks and term 39 (38-39) weeks. Birth weight (mean and SD) was 1767 (411) g for the preterm and 3456 (442) g for the term cohort. Power spectra demonstrated the greatest power in the low-frequency range of 100 to 250 Hz for both groups. There were significant differences (P <.05) in the average power at low (100-250 Hz), medium (250-500 Hz), high (500-1000 Hz), and very high (1000-2000 Hz) frequency bands. MFCC profiles also demonstrated significant differences between groups (P <.05). Conclusion: It is feasible to use DS technology to analyze breath sounds in neonates. DS was able to determine significant differences between the acoustic characteristics of term and preterm infants breathing in room air. Further investigation of DS technology for neonatal breath sounds is warranted.

KW - frequency

KW - infant

KW - lung

KW - power

KW - preterm

KW - term

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077839020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ppul.24633

DO - 10.1002/ppul.24633

M3 - Article

C2 - 31917903

AN - SCOPUS:85077839020

JO - Pediatric Pulmonology

JF - Pediatric Pulmonology

SN - 8755-6863

ER -