TY - JOUR
T1 - Acceptability of virtual restraint fitting to extend the reach of child restraint fitting services
T2 - a pilot randomized controlled trial
AU - Cooray, Nipuna
AU - Ho, Catherine
AU - Dai, Wennie
AU - Szabo, Rebecca
AU - Tailor, Kathy
AU - Maling, Miranda
AU - Chambers, Jason
AU - Koppel, Sjaan
AU - Bilston, Lynne
AU - Keay, Lisa
AU - Schwebel, David
AU - Brown, Julie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: Incorrect use of child restraints is a long-standing issue, limiting the protection offered by child restraints in the event of a crash. Child restraint fitting services are a measure to reduce incorrect use but have limited reach and availability to underserved populations. Virtual child restraint fitting services have the potential to increase the reach and availability, but as with any digital intervention, need to be acceptable to users to be effective. The acceptability of such interventions has not been studied before. Methods: Using a three-arm randomized controlled trial, this study evaluated the acceptability of: (1) a video with child restraint fitting advice (Control), (2) a traditional in-person child restraint fitting service (In-person), and (3) a virtual child restraint fitting service (Virtual). Additionally, the effectiveness in reducing incorrect use was evaluated. Results: There was a significantly higher level of overall acceptability for the in-person service, and significantly fewer errors in child restraint use in this group compared to the control. There were no significant differences in overall acceptability or errors between the virtual service and the control. However in-depth analysis of the constructs of acceptability demonstrated participants in the in-person and virtual service groups held similar views on four of the seven constructs including the usefulness of the services and the impact of the service on comprehension of key information for correct restraint use. Areas where the views differed between these groups included perceived burden, appropriateness, and opportunity costs. Qualitative feedback suggested these negative perceptions on the virtual service may be remediated with some improvements to the technology. Conclusions: Overall, child restraint fitting services provided virtually show promise as an alternative to in-person but attention to how services are provided via this technology, together with technology improvement, might be needed to fully realize its potential.
AB - Objective: Incorrect use of child restraints is a long-standing issue, limiting the protection offered by child restraints in the event of a crash. Child restraint fitting services are a measure to reduce incorrect use but have limited reach and availability to underserved populations. Virtual child restraint fitting services have the potential to increase the reach and availability, but as with any digital intervention, need to be acceptable to users to be effective. The acceptability of such interventions has not been studied before. Methods: Using a three-arm randomized controlled trial, this study evaluated the acceptability of: (1) a video with child restraint fitting advice (Control), (2) a traditional in-person child restraint fitting service (In-person), and (3) a virtual child restraint fitting service (Virtual). Additionally, the effectiveness in reducing incorrect use was evaluated. Results: There was a significantly higher level of overall acceptability for the in-person service, and significantly fewer errors in child restraint use in this group compared to the control. There were no significant differences in overall acceptability or errors between the virtual service and the control. However in-depth analysis of the constructs of acceptability demonstrated participants in the in-person and virtual service groups held similar views on four of the seven constructs including the usefulness of the services and the impact of the service on comprehension of key information for correct restraint use. Areas where the views differed between these groups included perceived burden, appropriateness, and opportunity costs. Qualitative feedback suggested these negative perceptions on the virtual service may be remediated with some improvements to the technology. Conclusions: Overall, child restraint fitting services provided virtually show promise as an alternative to in-person but attention to how services are provided via this technology, together with technology improvement, might be needed to fully realize its potential.
KW - augmented reality
KW - Car seats
KW - child injury
KW - traffic injury prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211507822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15389588.2024.2394966
DO - 10.1080/15389588.2024.2394966
M3 - Article
C2 - 39652707
AN - SCOPUS:85211507822
SN - 1538-9588
VL - 26
SP - 146
EP - 155
JO - Traffic Injury Prevention
JF - Traffic Injury Prevention
IS - 2
ER -