Absenteeism, gender and the morbidity–mortality paradox

Daniel Avdic, Per Johansson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Women are, on average, more often absent from work for health reasons than men, but live longer. This conflicting pattern suggests that the gender absenteeism gap arises partly from factors unrelated to objective health. An overlooked explanation is that men and women might have different preferences for absenteeism due to different attitudes to, for example, risk. Using detailed administrative data on absenteeism, hospitalizations, and mortality, we evaluate the existence of gender-specific preferences for absenteeism and analyze whether these differences are socially determined. We find robust evidence of gender differences in absenteeism that cannot be explained by poorer objective health among women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-462
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Applied Econometrics
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{ffc9ac1de1374254825668440842e154,
title = "Absenteeism, gender and the morbidity–mortality paradox",
abstract = "Women are, on average, more often absent from work for health reasons than men, but live longer. This conflicting pattern suggests that the gender absenteeism gap arises partly from factors unrelated to objective health. An overlooked explanation is that men and women might have different preferences for absenteeism due to different attitudes to, for example, risk. Using detailed administrative data on absenteeism, hospitalizations, and mortality, we evaluate the existence of gender-specific preferences for absenteeism and analyze whether these differences are socially determined. We find robust evidence of gender differences in absenteeism that cannot be explained by poorer objective health among women.",
author = "Daniel Avdic and Per Johansson",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jae.2516",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "440--462",
journal = "Journal of Applied Econometrics",
issn = "0883-7252",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Absenteeism, gender and the morbidity–mortality paradox. / Avdic, Daniel; Johansson, Per.

In: Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 440-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absenteeism, gender and the morbidity–mortality paradox

AU - Avdic, Daniel

AU - Johansson, Per

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Women are, on average, more often absent from work for health reasons than men, but live longer. This conflicting pattern suggests that the gender absenteeism gap arises partly from factors unrelated to objective health. An overlooked explanation is that men and women might have different preferences for absenteeism due to different attitudes to, for example, risk. Using detailed administrative data on absenteeism, hospitalizations, and mortality, we evaluate the existence of gender-specific preferences for absenteeism and analyze whether these differences are socially determined. We find robust evidence of gender differences in absenteeism that cannot be explained by poorer objective health among women.

AB - Women are, on average, more often absent from work for health reasons than men, but live longer. This conflicting pattern suggests that the gender absenteeism gap arises partly from factors unrelated to objective health. An overlooked explanation is that men and women might have different preferences for absenteeism due to different attitudes to, for example, risk. Using detailed administrative data on absenteeism, hospitalizations, and mortality, we evaluate the existence of gender-specific preferences for absenteeism and analyze whether these differences are socially determined. We find robust evidence of gender differences in absenteeism that cannot be explained by poorer objective health among women.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963904867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jae.2516

DO - 10.1002/jae.2516

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 440

EP - 462

JO - Journal of Applied Econometrics

JF - Journal of Applied Econometrics

SN - 0883-7252

IS - 2

ER -