Abandoning either/ors in analyzing shifts in humanitarian reporting

David Nolan, Stephanie Brookes, Michelle Imison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The shifting constitution of journalists as humanitarian actors has profound implications for changing forms of journalism practice, as well as for the normative models through which journalists understand and reflect on that practice. In an effort to develop a more empirically-grounded engagement with change, this article explores the interview testimonies of Australian journalists who cover international and humanitarian issues. It argues that frameworks reliant on stark oppositions (between past and present, optimism and pessimism, or moral agency and material structure) are both empirically and practically problematic, and seeks to move beyond these. Engagement with data from semi-structured interviews offers insight into how journalists’ perceptions of and responses to change are shaped by the historical and shifting institutional relations in which they are implicated.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalJournalism Practice
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 31 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • humanitarian reporting
  • Australia
  • humanitarian
  • international
  • journalism
  • ethics
  • norms
  • practice

Cite this

@article{70f9caf0b479475bb2f49cdb09510d21,
title = "Abandoning either/ors in analyzing shifts in humanitarian reporting",
abstract = "The shifting constitution of journalists as humanitarian actors has profound implications for changing forms of journalism practice, as well as for the normative models through which journalists understand and reflect on that practice. In an effort to develop a more empirically-grounded engagement with change, this article explores the interview testimonies of Australian journalists who cover international and humanitarian issues. It argues that frameworks reliant on stark oppositions (between past and present, optimism and pessimism, or moral agency and material structure) are both empirically and practically problematic, and seeks to move beyond these. Engagement with data from semi-structured interviews offers insight into how journalists’ perceptions of and responses to change are shaped by the historical and shifting institutional relations in which they are implicated.",
keywords = "humanitarian reporting, Australia, humanitarian, international, journalism, ethics, norms, practice",
author = "David Nolan and Stephanie Brookes and Michelle Imison",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/17512786.2019.1597638",
language = "English",
journal = "Journalism Practice",
issn = "1751-2786",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Abandoning either/ors in analyzing shifts in humanitarian reporting. / Nolan, David; Brookes, Stephanie; Imison, Michelle.

In: Journalism Practice, 31.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abandoning either/ors in analyzing shifts in humanitarian reporting

AU - Nolan, David

AU - Brookes, Stephanie

AU - Imison, Michelle

PY - 2019/3/31

Y1 - 2019/3/31

N2 - The shifting constitution of journalists as humanitarian actors has profound implications for changing forms of journalism practice, as well as for the normative models through which journalists understand and reflect on that practice. In an effort to develop a more empirically-grounded engagement with change, this article explores the interview testimonies of Australian journalists who cover international and humanitarian issues. It argues that frameworks reliant on stark oppositions (between past and present, optimism and pessimism, or moral agency and material structure) are both empirically and practically problematic, and seeks to move beyond these. Engagement with data from semi-structured interviews offers insight into how journalists’ perceptions of and responses to change are shaped by the historical and shifting institutional relations in which they are implicated.

AB - The shifting constitution of journalists as humanitarian actors has profound implications for changing forms of journalism practice, as well as for the normative models through which journalists understand and reflect on that practice. In an effort to develop a more empirically-grounded engagement with change, this article explores the interview testimonies of Australian journalists who cover international and humanitarian issues. It argues that frameworks reliant on stark oppositions (between past and present, optimism and pessimism, or moral agency and material structure) are both empirically and practically problematic, and seeks to move beyond these. Engagement with data from semi-structured interviews offers insight into how journalists’ perceptions of and responses to change are shaped by the historical and shifting institutional relations in which they are implicated.

KW - humanitarian reporting

KW - Australia

KW - humanitarian

KW - international

KW - journalism

KW - ethics

KW - norms

KW - practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063651029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17512786.2019.1597638

DO - 10.1080/17512786.2019.1597638

M3 - Article

JO - Journalism Practice

JF - Journalism Practice

SN - 1751-2786

ER -