A theory of tasteful and distasteful transactions

Elias L. Khalil, Alain Marciano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper develops a theory of tasteful and distasteful exchanges based on rational choice. By making reference to existing literature, we first differentiate repugnant from tasteful/distasteful transactions and bring up the additional consideration of the latter. There is a key difference between the two types of proscribed exchanges: repugnancy and distastefulness. The repugnancy of a transaction is determined by a single factor: tastes (preferences). The distastefulness of a transaction is determined by two factors: the true intention of the actor and the context of the transaction. We characterize tastefulness/distastefulness as a judgment: does the context of the transaction, which expresses “declared intention,” match the “true intention” of the actor? We identify four different kinds of intentions and their matching contexts of exchange. This allows us to classify four different kinds of tasteful transactions, i.e. when true intentions correspond to declared ones—i.e., to their context. It also allows us to classify twelve different kinds of distasteful transactions.

LanguageEnglish
Pages110-131
Number of pages22
JournalKyklos
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2018

Cite this

Khalil, Elias L. ; Marciano, Alain. / A theory of tasteful and distasteful transactions. In: Kyklos. 2018 ; Vol. 71, No. 1. pp. 110-131
@article{8acd658691d14761b0e9934be5838b2b,
title = "A theory of tasteful and distasteful transactions",
abstract = "This paper develops a theory of tasteful and distasteful exchanges based on rational choice. By making reference to existing literature, we first differentiate repugnant from tasteful/distasteful transactions and bring up the additional consideration of the latter. There is a key difference between the two types of proscribed exchanges: repugnancy and distastefulness. The repugnancy of a transaction is determined by a single factor: tastes (preferences). The distastefulness of a transaction is determined by two factors: the true intention of the actor and the context of the transaction. We characterize tastefulness/distastefulness as a judgment: does the context of the transaction, which expresses “declared intention,” match the “true intention” of the actor? We identify four different kinds of intentions and their matching contexts of exchange. This allows us to classify four different kinds of tasteful transactions, i.e. when true intentions correspond to declared ones—i.e., to their context. It also allows us to classify twelve different kinds of distasteful transactions.",
author = "Khalil, {Elias L.} and Alain Marciano",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/kykl.12164",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "110--131",
journal = "Kyklos",
issn = "0023-5962",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Khalil, EL & Marciano, A 2018, 'A theory of tasteful and distasteful transactions' Kyklos, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 110-131. DOI: 10.1111/kykl.12164

A theory of tasteful and distasteful transactions. / Khalil, Elias L.; Marciano, Alain.

In: Kyklos, Vol. 71, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 110-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A theory of tasteful and distasteful transactions

AU - Khalil,Elias L.

AU - Marciano,Alain

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - This paper develops a theory of tasteful and distasteful exchanges based on rational choice. By making reference to existing literature, we first differentiate repugnant from tasteful/distasteful transactions and bring up the additional consideration of the latter. There is a key difference between the two types of proscribed exchanges: repugnancy and distastefulness. The repugnancy of a transaction is determined by a single factor: tastes (preferences). The distastefulness of a transaction is determined by two factors: the true intention of the actor and the context of the transaction. We characterize tastefulness/distastefulness as a judgment: does the context of the transaction, which expresses “declared intention,” match the “true intention” of the actor? We identify four different kinds of intentions and their matching contexts of exchange. This allows us to classify four different kinds of tasteful transactions, i.e. when true intentions correspond to declared ones—i.e., to their context. It also allows us to classify twelve different kinds of distasteful transactions.

AB - This paper develops a theory of tasteful and distasteful exchanges based on rational choice. By making reference to existing literature, we first differentiate repugnant from tasteful/distasteful transactions and bring up the additional consideration of the latter. There is a key difference between the two types of proscribed exchanges: repugnancy and distastefulness. The repugnancy of a transaction is determined by a single factor: tastes (preferences). The distastefulness of a transaction is determined by two factors: the true intention of the actor and the context of the transaction. We characterize tastefulness/distastefulness as a judgment: does the context of the transaction, which expresses “declared intention,” match the “true intention” of the actor? We identify four different kinds of intentions and their matching contexts of exchange. This allows us to classify four different kinds of tasteful transactions, i.e. when true intentions correspond to declared ones—i.e., to their context. It also allows us to classify twelve different kinds of distasteful transactions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040516483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/kykl.12164

DO - 10.1111/kykl.12164

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 110

EP - 131

JO - Kyklos

T2 - Kyklos

JF - Kyklos

SN - 0023-5962

IS - 1

ER -

Khalil EL, Marciano A. A theory of tasteful and distasteful transactions. Kyklos. 2018 Feb 1;71(1):110-131. Available from, DOI: 10.1111/kykl.12164