Abstract
This paper explores the ways in which senior female academics leadership practices are
informed and negotiated in relation to a multiplicity of fields. As part of the shift in the
logics of practice underpinning the Australian academic terrain, there has been a
movement from the implementation of equity policies to that of diversity in relation to
the employment of academic staff, characterised by neoliberal discourses of new public
management which favour the production of the individualistic, entrepreneurial
academic identity as opposed to notions of collectivity and the public good. However,
diversity policies are not the sole texts that inform the ways in which many women
leaders operate, nor the most important in guiding the practices they produce.
Drawing on a larger study of representations of women s leadership in the media and
academia, this paper examines how two leading female academics drew upon a range
of logics of practices within the different fields of academia, feminism and Indigenous
rights to inform their leadership practices. In so doing, the women contested the
emergent logic of practice underpinning the contemporary Australian academic field.
Such contestation can be considered one of the subaltern consequences of policy
regimes and forms an integral part of policy fields.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 39 - 54 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | The Australian Educational Researcher |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |