A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005

Anthony LaMontagne, Tessa Keegel, Amber Louie, Aleck Ostry, Paul Landsbergis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

376 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual- level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationallyfocused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further measures are needed to foster the dissemination and implementation of systems approaches to examining interventions for job stress.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268 - 280
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Volume13
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this