A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery

Ru Dee Chung, David J. Hunter-Smith, Robert T. Spychal, Venkat V. Ramakrishnan, Warren Matthew Rozen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Process mapping has been identified as a strategy to improve surgical efficiency but has been inconsistently applied in the literature and underutilised in surgical practice. In this journal, we recently described our utilisation of these approaches when applied to breast reconstruction. We showed that in surgery as complex as autologous breast reconstruction, process mapping can improve efficiency, and may improve surgical teaching, education and audit. The intraoperative period specifically is an area that can be applied not only to breast reconstruction, but to a much broader range of surgical procedures. A systematic review was undertaken of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase and PsychINFO. Manual searching of the references from articles identified was also conducted. Data items relating to the review aims were extracted from articles' methods, applications, and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was carried out to synthesise the information on the current usage of process mapping in the intraoperative period. Seventeen of 1,488 studies were eligible for review, with all of non-randomised study design. Studies had overlap in components of the intraoperative period to which process mapping was applied. Common areas of improvement were identified. Outcome measures were assessed in ten studies that implemented interventions based on the improvement areas to increase surgical efficiency. As such, process mapping has been used as part of larger quality improvement methods, albeit with inconsistent nomenclature, to improve surgical efficiency. While it has been applied to a range of surgical specialties, there is a lack of application to the surgical component of the intraoperative period. Greater consistency in the reporting and description of process mapping will enable further research for evidence of its benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-725
Number of pages11
JournalGland Surgery
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Efficiency
  • Process assessment (Healthcare)
  • Process mapping
  • Quality improvement (QI)
  • Task performance and analysis
  • Total quality management

Cite this

Chung, Ru Dee ; Hunter-Smith, David J. ; Spychal, Robert T. ; Ramakrishnan, Venkat V. ; Rozen, Warren Matthew. / A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery. In: Gland Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 6, No. 6. pp. 715-725.
@article{889b56f516504e6b9113a2513126dde8,
title = "A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery",
abstract = "Process mapping has been identified as a strategy to improve surgical efficiency but has been inconsistently applied in the literature and underutilised in surgical practice. In this journal, we recently described our utilisation of these approaches when applied to breast reconstruction. We showed that in surgery as complex as autologous breast reconstruction, process mapping can improve efficiency, and may improve surgical teaching, education and audit. The intraoperative period specifically is an area that can be applied not only to breast reconstruction, but to a much broader range of surgical procedures. A systematic review was undertaken of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase and PsychINFO. Manual searching of the references from articles identified was also conducted. Data items relating to the review aims were extracted from articles' methods, applications, and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was carried out to synthesise the information on the current usage of process mapping in the intraoperative period. Seventeen of 1,488 studies were eligible for review, with all of non-randomised study design. Studies had overlap in components of the intraoperative period to which process mapping was applied. Common areas of improvement were identified. Outcome measures were assessed in ten studies that implemented interventions based on the improvement areas to increase surgical efficiency. As such, process mapping has been used as part of larger quality improvement methods, albeit with inconsistent nomenclature, to improve surgical efficiency. While it has been applied to a range of surgical specialties, there is a lack of application to the surgical component of the intraoperative period. Greater consistency in the reporting and description of process mapping will enable further research for evidence of its benefits.",
keywords = "Efficiency, Process assessment (Healthcare), Process mapping, Quality improvement (QI), Task performance and analysis, Total quality management",
author = "Chung, {Ru Dee} and Hunter-Smith, {David J.} and Spychal, {Robert T.} and Ramakrishnan, {Venkat V.} and Rozen, {Warren Matthew}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21037/gs.2017.11.02",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "715--725",
journal = "Gland Surgery",
issn = "2227-684X",
number = "6",

}

A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery. / Chung, Ru Dee; Hunter-Smith, David J.; Spychal, Robert T.; Ramakrishnan, Venkat V.; Rozen, Warren Matthew.

In: Gland Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 6, 01.12.2017, p. 715-725.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery

AU - Chung, Ru Dee

AU - Hunter-Smith, David J.

AU - Spychal, Robert T.

AU - Ramakrishnan, Venkat V.

AU - Rozen, Warren Matthew

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Process mapping has been identified as a strategy to improve surgical efficiency but has been inconsistently applied in the literature and underutilised in surgical practice. In this journal, we recently described our utilisation of these approaches when applied to breast reconstruction. We showed that in surgery as complex as autologous breast reconstruction, process mapping can improve efficiency, and may improve surgical teaching, education and audit. The intraoperative period specifically is an area that can be applied not only to breast reconstruction, but to a much broader range of surgical procedures. A systematic review was undertaken of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase and PsychINFO. Manual searching of the references from articles identified was also conducted. Data items relating to the review aims were extracted from articles' methods, applications, and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was carried out to synthesise the information on the current usage of process mapping in the intraoperative period. Seventeen of 1,488 studies were eligible for review, with all of non-randomised study design. Studies had overlap in components of the intraoperative period to which process mapping was applied. Common areas of improvement were identified. Outcome measures were assessed in ten studies that implemented interventions based on the improvement areas to increase surgical efficiency. As such, process mapping has been used as part of larger quality improvement methods, albeit with inconsistent nomenclature, to improve surgical efficiency. While it has been applied to a range of surgical specialties, there is a lack of application to the surgical component of the intraoperative period. Greater consistency in the reporting and description of process mapping will enable further research for evidence of its benefits.

AB - Process mapping has been identified as a strategy to improve surgical efficiency but has been inconsistently applied in the literature and underutilised in surgical practice. In this journal, we recently described our utilisation of these approaches when applied to breast reconstruction. We showed that in surgery as complex as autologous breast reconstruction, process mapping can improve efficiency, and may improve surgical teaching, education and audit. The intraoperative period specifically is an area that can be applied not only to breast reconstruction, but to a much broader range of surgical procedures. A systematic review was undertaken of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase and PsychINFO. Manual searching of the references from articles identified was also conducted. Data items relating to the review aims were extracted from articles' methods, applications, and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was carried out to synthesise the information on the current usage of process mapping in the intraoperative period. Seventeen of 1,488 studies were eligible for review, with all of non-randomised study design. Studies had overlap in components of the intraoperative period to which process mapping was applied. Common areas of improvement were identified. Outcome measures were assessed in ten studies that implemented interventions based on the improvement areas to increase surgical efficiency. As such, process mapping has been used as part of larger quality improvement methods, albeit with inconsistent nomenclature, to improve surgical efficiency. While it has been applied to a range of surgical specialties, there is a lack of application to the surgical component of the intraoperative period. Greater consistency in the reporting and description of process mapping will enable further research for evidence of its benefits.

KW - Efficiency

KW - Process assessment (Healthcare)

KW - Process mapping

KW - Quality improvement (QI)

KW - Task performance and analysis

KW - Total quality management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037854210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21037/gs.2017.11.02

DO - 10.21037/gs.2017.11.02

M3 - Review Article

VL - 6

SP - 715

EP - 725

JO - Gland Surgery

JF - Gland Surgery

SN - 2227-684X

IS - 6

ER -