Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Ileal Conduit and Neobladder Outcomes in Primary Bladder Cancer

  • Jack Crozier
  • , Derek Hennessey
  • , Shomik Sengupta
  • , Damien Bolton
  • , Nathan Lawrentschuk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer with curative intent includes radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Using PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review assessing differences in patient selection, operative parameters, complications, and quality of life between ileal conduit and neobladder cohorts. Ileal conduit cohorts have more advanced age and disease, more comorbidities and complications, and poorer quality of life. Ileal conduit surgery is associated with adverse patient selection that inhibits reasonable comparison of outcomes with neobladder cohorts. Despite this, we observe longer operative times and hospital stays in neobladder cohorts, perhaps reflecting greater technical difficulty and the need for postoperative bladder training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-79
Number of pages6
JournalUrology
Volume96
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Cite this