A social inequality of motivation?

The relationship between beliefs about academic success and young people's educational attainment

Jonathan Frederick Smith, Zlatko Skrbis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Meritocratic ideals, which emphasise individual responsibility and self-motivation, have featured prominently in discourses about Australia's international competitiveness in academic achievement. Young people are often encouraged to attribute academic success and failure to individual factors such as hard work and talent, and to downplay extrinsic factors such as luck, task difficulty, or broader structural advantages and disadvantages. Using longitudinal data on a large, single-age cohort (n=2,145) of young Australians participating in the Social Futures and Life Pathways (‘Our Lives’) project, we analyse the relationship between attributions for academic success across their final years of secondary schooling and how they related to educational attainment at the end of school. The belief that hard work would lead to academic success was widespread within the sample and positively associated with subsequent educational performance. Most students also emphasised the importance of having a supportive family, despite this being negatively associated with performance. Consistent with claims about a ‘social inequality of motivation’, the findings suggest that emphasising meritocracy may compound the disadvantages of young people from less educated or vocational backgrounds, and those living in rural and regional Australia, whilst impacting unevenly on males' and females' academic performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441–465
Number of pages25
JournalBritish Educational Research Journal
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • social inequality
  • attribution theory
  • habitus; meritocracy
  • academic motivation

Cite this

@article{07304b2b59f546a1a899a0b7c9c580b2,
title = "A social inequality of motivation?: The relationship between beliefs about academic success and young people's educational attainment",
abstract = "Meritocratic ideals, which emphasise individual responsibility and self-motivation, have featured prominently in discourses about Australia's international competitiveness in academic achievement. Young people are often encouraged to attribute academic success and failure to individual factors such as hard work and talent, and to downplay extrinsic factors such as luck, task difficulty, or broader structural advantages and disadvantages. Using longitudinal data on a large, single-age cohort (n=2,145) of young Australians participating in the Social Futures and Life Pathways (‘Our Lives’) project, we analyse the relationship between attributions for academic success across their final years of secondary schooling and how they related to educational attainment at the end of school. The belief that hard work would lead to academic success was widespread within the sample and positively associated with subsequent educational performance. Most students also emphasised the importance of having a supportive family, despite this being negatively associated with performance. Consistent with claims about a ‘social inequality of motivation’, the findings suggest that emphasising meritocracy may compound the disadvantages of young people from less educated or vocational backgrounds, and those living in rural and regional Australia, whilst impacting unevenly on males' and females' academic performance.",
keywords = "social inequality, attribution theory, habitus; meritocracy, academic motivation",
author = "Smith, {Jonathan Frederick} and Zlatko Skrbis",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/berj.3272",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "441–465",
journal = "British Educational Research Journal",
issn = "0141-1926",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

A social inequality of motivation? The relationship between beliefs about academic success and young people's educational attainment. / Smith, Jonathan Frederick; Skrbis, Zlatko.

In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2017, p. 441–465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A social inequality of motivation?

T2 - The relationship between beliefs about academic success and young people's educational attainment

AU - Smith, Jonathan Frederick

AU - Skrbis, Zlatko

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Meritocratic ideals, which emphasise individual responsibility and self-motivation, have featured prominently in discourses about Australia's international competitiveness in academic achievement. Young people are often encouraged to attribute academic success and failure to individual factors such as hard work and talent, and to downplay extrinsic factors such as luck, task difficulty, or broader structural advantages and disadvantages. Using longitudinal data on a large, single-age cohort (n=2,145) of young Australians participating in the Social Futures and Life Pathways (‘Our Lives’) project, we analyse the relationship between attributions for academic success across their final years of secondary schooling and how they related to educational attainment at the end of school. The belief that hard work would lead to academic success was widespread within the sample and positively associated with subsequent educational performance. Most students also emphasised the importance of having a supportive family, despite this being negatively associated with performance. Consistent with claims about a ‘social inequality of motivation’, the findings suggest that emphasising meritocracy may compound the disadvantages of young people from less educated or vocational backgrounds, and those living in rural and regional Australia, whilst impacting unevenly on males' and females' academic performance.

AB - Meritocratic ideals, which emphasise individual responsibility and self-motivation, have featured prominently in discourses about Australia's international competitiveness in academic achievement. Young people are often encouraged to attribute academic success and failure to individual factors such as hard work and talent, and to downplay extrinsic factors such as luck, task difficulty, or broader structural advantages and disadvantages. Using longitudinal data on a large, single-age cohort (n=2,145) of young Australians participating in the Social Futures and Life Pathways (‘Our Lives’) project, we analyse the relationship between attributions for academic success across their final years of secondary schooling and how they related to educational attainment at the end of school. The belief that hard work would lead to academic success was widespread within the sample and positively associated with subsequent educational performance. Most students also emphasised the importance of having a supportive family, despite this being negatively associated with performance. Consistent with claims about a ‘social inequality of motivation’, the findings suggest that emphasising meritocracy may compound the disadvantages of young people from less educated or vocational backgrounds, and those living in rural and regional Australia, whilst impacting unevenly on males' and females' academic performance.

KW - social inequality

KW - attribution theory

KW - habitus; meritocracy

KW - academic motivation

U2 - 10.1002/berj.3272

DO - 10.1002/berj.3272

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 441

EP - 465

JO - British Educational Research Journal

JF - British Educational Research Journal

SN - 0141-1926

IS - 3

ER -