A second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the moral distress scale-revised for nurses

Hamid Sharif Nia, Vida Shafipour, Kelly-Ann Allen, Mohammad Reza Heidari, Jamshid Yazdani-Charati, Armin Zareiyan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Moral distress is a growing problem for healthcare professionals that may lead to dissatisfaction, resignation, or occupational burnout if left unattended, and nurses experience different levels of this phenomenon. Objectives:: This study aims to investigate the factor structure of the Persian version of the Moral Distress Scale–Revised in intensive care and general nurses. Research design: This methodological research was conducted with 771 nurses from eight hospitals in the Mazandaran Province of Iran in 2017. Participants completed the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, data collected, and factor structure assessed using the construct, convergent, and divergent validity methods. The reliability of the scale was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, Theta, and McDonald’s omega coefficients) and construct reliability. Ethical considerations: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Findings: The exploratory factor analysis (N = 380) showed that the Moral Distress Scale–Revised has five factors: lack of professional competence at work, ignoring ethical issues and patient conditions, futile care, carrying out the physician’s orders without question and unsafe care, and providing care under personal and organizational pressures, which explained 56.62% of the overall variance. The confirmatory factor analysis (N = 391) supported the five-factor solution and the second-order latent factor model. The first-order model did not show a favorable convergent and divergent validity. Ultimately, the Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to have a favorable internal consistency and construct reliability. Discussion and conclusion: The Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to be a multidimensional construct. The data obtained confirmed the hypothesis of the factor structure model with a latent second-order variable. Since the convergent and divergent validity of the scale were not confirmed in this study, further assessment is necessary in future studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1199-1210
Number of pages12
JournalNursing Ethics
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Factor analysis
  • moral distress
  • nurses
  • psychometric
  • reliability
  • validity

Cite this

Nia, H. S., Shafipour, V., Allen, K-A., Heidari, M. R., Yazdani-Charati, J., & Zareiyan, A. (2019). A second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the moral distress scale-revised for nurses. Nursing Ethics, 26(4), 1199-1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017742962
Nia, Hamid Sharif ; Shafipour, Vida ; Allen, Kelly-Ann ; Heidari, Mohammad Reza ; Yazdani-Charati, Jamshid ; Zareiyan, Armin. / A second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the moral distress scale-revised for nurses. In: Nursing Ethics. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 1199-1210.
@article{8f6d6265db364dfa9506d23caaaad6a4,
title = "A second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the moral distress scale-revised for nurses",
abstract = "Background: Moral distress is a growing problem for healthcare professionals that may lead to dissatisfaction, resignation, or occupational burnout if left unattended, and nurses experience different levels of this phenomenon. Objectives:: This study aims to investigate the factor structure of the Persian version of the Moral Distress Scale–Revised in intensive care and general nurses. Research design: This methodological research was conducted with 771 nurses from eight hospitals in the Mazandaran Province of Iran in 2017. Participants completed the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, data collected, and factor structure assessed using the construct, convergent, and divergent validity methods. The reliability of the scale was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, Theta, and McDonald’s omega coefficients) and construct reliability. Ethical considerations: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Findings: The exploratory factor analysis (N = 380) showed that the Moral Distress Scale–Revised has five factors: lack of professional competence at work, ignoring ethical issues and patient conditions, futile care, carrying out the physician’s orders without question and unsafe care, and providing care under personal and organizational pressures, which explained 56.62{\%} of the overall variance. The confirmatory factor analysis (N = 391) supported the five-factor solution and the second-order latent factor model. The first-order model did not show a favorable convergent and divergent validity. Ultimately, the Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to have a favorable internal consistency and construct reliability. Discussion and conclusion: The Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to be a multidimensional construct. The data obtained confirmed the hypothesis of the factor structure model with a latent second-order variable. Since the convergent and divergent validity of the scale were not confirmed in this study, further assessment is necessary in future studies.",
keywords = "Factor analysis, moral distress, nurses, psychometric, reliability, validity",
author = "Nia, {Hamid Sharif} and Vida Shafipour and Kelly-Ann Allen and Heidari, {Mohammad Reza} and Jamshid Yazdani-Charati and Armin Zareiyan",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0969733017742962",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1199--1210",
journal = "Nursing Ethics",
issn = "0969-7330",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Nia, HS, Shafipour, V, Allen, K-A, Heidari, MR, Yazdani-Charati, J & Zareiyan, A 2019, 'A second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the moral distress scale-revised for nurses', Nursing Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1199-1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017742962

A second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the moral distress scale-revised for nurses. / Nia, Hamid Sharif; Shafipour, Vida; Allen, Kelly-Ann; Heidari, Mohammad Reza; Yazdani-Charati, Jamshid; Zareiyan, Armin.

In: Nursing Ethics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2019, p. 1199-1210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the moral distress scale-revised for nurses

AU - Nia, Hamid Sharif

AU - Shafipour, Vida

AU - Allen, Kelly-Ann

AU - Heidari, Mohammad Reza

AU - Yazdani-Charati, Jamshid

AU - Zareiyan, Armin

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: Moral distress is a growing problem for healthcare professionals that may lead to dissatisfaction, resignation, or occupational burnout if left unattended, and nurses experience different levels of this phenomenon. Objectives:: This study aims to investigate the factor structure of the Persian version of the Moral Distress Scale–Revised in intensive care and general nurses. Research design: This methodological research was conducted with 771 nurses from eight hospitals in the Mazandaran Province of Iran in 2017. Participants completed the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, data collected, and factor structure assessed using the construct, convergent, and divergent validity methods. The reliability of the scale was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, Theta, and McDonald’s omega coefficients) and construct reliability. Ethical considerations: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Findings: The exploratory factor analysis (N = 380) showed that the Moral Distress Scale–Revised has five factors: lack of professional competence at work, ignoring ethical issues and patient conditions, futile care, carrying out the physician’s orders without question and unsafe care, and providing care under personal and organizational pressures, which explained 56.62% of the overall variance. The confirmatory factor analysis (N = 391) supported the five-factor solution and the second-order latent factor model. The first-order model did not show a favorable convergent and divergent validity. Ultimately, the Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to have a favorable internal consistency and construct reliability. Discussion and conclusion: The Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to be a multidimensional construct. The data obtained confirmed the hypothesis of the factor structure model with a latent second-order variable. Since the convergent and divergent validity of the scale were not confirmed in this study, further assessment is necessary in future studies.

AB - Background: Moral distress is a growing problem for healthcare professionals that may lead to dissatisfaction, resignation, or occupational burnout if left unattended, and nurses experience different levels of this phenomenon. Objectives:: This study aims to investigate the factor structure of the Persian version of the Moral Distress Scale–Revised in intensive care and general nurses. Research design: This methodological research was conducted with 771 nurses from eight hospitals in the Mazandaran Province of Iran in 2017. Participants completed the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, data collected, and factor structure assessed using the construct, convergent, and divergent validity methods. The reliability of the scale was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, Theta, and McDonald’s omega coefficients) and construct reliability. Ethical considerations: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Findings: The exploratory factor analysis (N = 380) showed that the Moral Distress Scale–Revised has five factors: lack of professional competence at work, ignoring ethical issues and patient conditions, futile care, carrying out the physician’s orders without question and unsafe care, and providing care under personal and organizational pressures, which explained 56.62% of the overall variance. The confirmatory factor analysis (N = 391) supported the five-factor solution and the second-order latent factor model. The first-order model did not show a favorable convergent and divergent validity. Ultimately, the Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to have a favorable internal consistency and construct reliability. Discussion and conclusion: The Moral Distress Scale–Revised was found to be a multidimensional construct. The data obtained confirmed the hypothesis of the factor structure model with a latent second-order variable. Since the convergent and divergent validity of the scale were not confirmed in this study, further assessment is necessary in future studies.

KW - Factor analysis

KW - moral distress

KW - nurses

KW - psychometric

KW - reliability

KW - validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041339510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0969733017742962

DO - 10.1177/0969733017742962

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1199

EP - 1210

JO - Nursing Ethics

JF - Nursing Ethics

SN - 0969-7330

IS - 4

ER -