A scoping review of different ways of thinking in children

Elisa Jones Arango, Shane Costello, Christine Grové

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in differences in thinking, much less is known about differences in how children think and how they come to think. The aim of this scoping review is to map out the key concepts underpinning the conceptual boundaries of children’s (5–12 years of age) individual differences in thinking. The scoping review identified eight papers for analysis; all of which were set in an educational context. The findings presented inconclusive results regarding learning and thinking differences related to students’ academic achievement. This review has identified two main drawbacks with this research area. Firstly, there is little consensus between the models employed to understand the different ways children think. To further place these findings into context we look at conceptualisations of individual differences, where individuality is considered a process of stable characteristics interacting with more dynamic structures. This analysis highlights the second drawback, previous research has solely focused on exploring thinking characteristics that are not stable and are therefore subject to change depending on the context. The review found that there is little to no research which explores thinking preferences in children that are consistent across contexts and time. Moreover, there was no research identified that explored the impact of differences in thinking outside the educational domain, such as children’s wellbeing. Further research is required to identify the more stable characteristics that reflect and capture children’s different ways of thinking.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115
Number of pages16
JournalBehavioral Sciences
Volume8
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • Children
  • Individual differences in thinking
  • Scoping review

Cite this

@article{d68e01437b16470a921dd0eb06c64193,
title = "A scoping review of different ways of thinking in children",
abstract = "Despite the growing interest in differences in thinking, much less is known about differences in how children think and how they come to think. The aim of this scoping review is to map out the key concepts underpinning the conceptual boundaries of children’s (5–12 years of age) individual differences in thinking. The scoping review identified eight papers for analysis; all of which were set in an educational context. The findings presented inconclusive results regarding learning and thinking differences related to students’ academic achievement. This review has identified two main drawbacks with this research area. Firstly, there is little consensus between the models employed to understand the different ways children think. To further place these findings into context we look at conceptualisations of individual differences, where individuality is considered a process of stable characteristics interacting with more dynamic structures. This analysis highlights the second drawback, previous research has solely focused on exploring thinking characteristics that are not stable and are therefore subject to change depending on the context. The review found that there is little to no research which explores thinking preferences in children that are consistent across contexts and time. Moreover, there was no research identified that explored the impact of differences in thinking outside the educational domain, such as children’s wellbeing. Further research is required to identify the more stable characteristics that reflect and capture children’s different ways of thinking.",
keywords = "Children, Individual differences in thinking, Scoping review",
author = "{Jones Arango}, Elisa and Shane Costello and Christine Grov{\'e}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.3390/bs8120115",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences",
issn = "2076-328X",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "12",

}

A scoping review of different ways of thinking in children. / Jones Arango, Elisa; Costello, Shane; Grové, Christine.

In: Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 12, 115, 15.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A scoping review of different ways of thinking in children

AU - Jones Arango, Elisa

AU - Costello, Shane

AU - Grové, Christine

PY - 2018/12/15

Y1 - 2018/12/15

N2 - Despite the growing interest in differences in thinking, much less is known about differences in how children think and how they come to think. The aim of this scoping review is to map out the key concepts underpinning the conceptual boundaries of children’s (5–12 years of age) individual differences in thinking. The scoping review identified eight papers for analysis; all of which were set in an educational context. The findings presented inconclusive results regarding learning and thinking differences related to students’ academic achievement. This review has identified two main drawbacks with this research area. Firstly, there is little consensus between the models employed to understand the different ways children think. To further place these findings into context we look at conceptualisations of individual differences, where individuality is considered a process of stable characteristics interacting with more dynamic structures. This analysis highlights the second drawback, previous research has solely focused on exploring thinking characteristics that are not stable and are therefore subject to change depending on the context. The review found that there is little to no research which explores thinking preferences in children that are consistent across contexts and time. Moreover, there was no research identified that explored the impact of differences in thinking outside the educational domain, such as children’s wellbeing. Further research is required to identify the more stable characteristics that reflect and capture children’s different ways of thinking.

AB - Despite the growing interest in differences in thinking, much less is known about differences in how children think and how they come to think. The aim of this scoping review is to map out the key concepts underpinning the conceptual boundaries of children’s (5–12 years of age) individual differences in thinking. The scoping review identified eight papers for analysis; all of which were set in an educational context. The findings presented inconclusive results regarding learning and thinking differences related to students’ academic achievement. This review has identified two main drawbacks with this research area. Firstly, there is little consensus between the models employed to understand the different ways children think. To further place these findings into context we look at conceptualisations of individual differences, where individuality is considered a process of stable characteristics interacting with more dynamic structures. This analysis highlights the second drawback, previous research has solely focused on exploring thinking characteristics that are not stable and are therefore subject to change depending on the context. The review found that there is little to no research which explores thinking preferences in children that are consistent across contexts and time. Moreover, there was no research identified that explored the impact of differences in thinking outside the educational domain, such as children’s wellbeing. Further research is required to identify the more stable characteristics that reflect and capture children’s different ways of thinking.

KW - Children

KW - Individual differences in thinking

KW - Scoping review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063142553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/bs8120115

DO - 10.3390/bs8120115

M3 - Review Article

VL - 8

JO - Behavioral Sciences

JF - Behavioral Sciences

SN - 2076-328X

IS - 12

M1 - 115

ER -