TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomised crossover trial of post-operative cognitive and psychomotor recovery from benzodiazepine sedation
T2 - Effects of reversal with flumazenil over a prolonged recovery period
AU - Girdler, N. M.
AU - Fairbrother, K. J.
AU - Lyne, J. P.
AU - Neave, N.
AU - Scholey, A.
AU - Hargaden, N.
AU - Wesnes, K. A.
AU - Engler, J.
AU - Rotherham, N. A.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2002/3/23
Y1 - 2002/3/23
N2 - Objective: To study the post-operative cognitive and psychomotor recovery from midazolam conscious sedation, after reversal with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil over a prolonged recovery period. Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomised, crossover trial. Setting: Out-patient Sedation Department, Newcastle Dental Hospital and School Method: Eighteen patients, ASA I or II, received midazolam on two separate occasions to undergo equivalent dental treatment Following treatment patients were reversed with intravenous flumazenil or saline [placebo] at alternate appointments. Assessment of mood and cognitive function was undertaken using a highly sensitive and specific computerised battery of cognitive tests administered by telephone. Cognitive and psychomotor tests were administered prior to sedation and every hour for 6 hours post reversal. Results: Results indicated no significant effect of flumazenil on simple reaction time and choice reaction time but did show a trend of reversing the effects of midazolam on numeric working memory and word recognition. Conclusion: The cognitive and psychomotor effects of the sedation were not fully reversed by flumazenil. Cognitive impairments were still present up to 6 hours post-reversal, despite patients appearing clinically more alert. This has important implications for treatment protocols and discharge instructions.
AB - Objective: To study the post-operative cognitive and psychomotor recovery from midazolam conscious sedation, after reversal with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil over a prolonged recovery period. Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomised, crossover trial. Setting: Out-patient Sedation Department, Newcastle Dental Hospital and School Method: Eighteen patients, ASA I or II, received midazolam on two separate occasions to undergo equivalent dental treatment Following treatment patients were reversed with intravenous flumazenil or saline [placebo] at alternate appointments. Assessment of mood and cognitive function was undertaken using a highly sensitive and specific computerised battery of cognitive tests administered by telephone. Cognitive and psychomotor tests were administered prior to sedation and every hour for 6 hours post reversal. Results: Results indicated no significant effect of flumazenil on simple reaction time and choice reaction time but did show a trend of reversing the effects of midazolam on numeric working memory and word recognition. Conclusion: The cognitive and psychomotor effects of the sedation were not fully reversed by flumazenil. Cognitive impairments were still present up to 6 hours post-reversal, despite patients appearing clinically more alert. This has important implications for treatment protocols and discharge instructions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001055077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801369
DO - 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801369
M3 - Article
C2 - 15552071
AN - SCOPUS:0001055077
VL - 192
SP - 335
EP - 339
JO - British Dental Journal
JF - British Dental Journal
SN - 0007-0610
IS - 6
ER -