A qualitative exploration of SMART Recovery meetings in Australia and the role of a digital platform to support routine outcome monitoring

Rebecca M. Gray, Peter J. Kelly, Alison K. Beck, Amanda L. Baker, Frank P. Deane, Joanne Neale, Carla Treloar, Leanne Hides, Victoria Manning, Anthony Shakeshaft, John Kelly, Angela Argent, Ryan McGlaughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Previous research has reported on the benefits of mutual support groups. However, such groups do not routinely collect data on participant outcomes. Moreover, the effect of collecting outcomes measures on these groups is unknown. The objective of this mixed methods study was to elicit participant views on using a novel, purpose built digital platform for routine outcome monitoring (ROM) as a standard component of a mutual support group. SMART Recovery, or the Self-Management and Recovery Training program, is group-based and uses professional clinicians to facilitate discussion and foster mutual support for a range of addictive behaviours, alongside Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Motivational Interviewing techniques. This paper reports on the qualitative component of this study and how participants perceive ROMs, and the potential shift to technological resources. Twenty semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with participants from SMART Recovery groups across New South Wales, Australia. Participants discussed their use of mutual support within group meetings to manage their recovery, including: naming their goals in front of peers; learning from clinicians and group discussion; and developing reciprocal and caring relationships. They also described any previous experience with routine outcomes measures and how digital technologies might enhance or hinder group function. Participants valued mutual support groups and reported that digital technologies could be complementary to physical, weekly group meetings. They were also concerned that the introduction of technological resources might pose a threat to physical meetings, thereby risking their access to mutual support. Findings have implications for the implementation of ROM when delivered via digital mechanisms, and indicate threats and opportunities that warrant consideration for future initiatives.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106144
Number of pages7
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume101
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Keywords

  • Addiction
  • mHealth
  • Mutual support
  • Qualitative
  • Routine outcome monitoring
  • SMART Recovery

Cite this

Gray, Rebecca M. ; Kelly, Peter J. ; Beck, Alison K. ; Baker, Amanda L. ; Deane, Frank P. ; Neale, Joanne ; Treloar, Carla ; Hides, Leanne ; Manning, Victoria ; Shakeshaft, Anthony ; Kelly, John ; Argent, Angela ; McGlaughlin, Ryan. / A qualitative exploration of SMART Recovery meetings in Australia and the role of a digital platform to support routine outcome monitoring. In: Addictive Behaviors. 2020 ; Vol. 101.
@article{d38034b423e3434b9300832d9ea2207f,
title = "A qualitative exploration of SMART Recovery meetings in Australia and the role of a digital platform to support routine outcome monitoring",
abstract = "Previous research has reported on the benefits of mutual support groups. However, such groups do not routinely collect data on participant outcomes. Moreover, the effect of collecting outcomes measures on these groups is unknown. The objective of this mixed methods study was to elicit participant views on using a novel, purpose built digital platform for routine outcome monitoring (ROM) as a standard component of a mutual support group. SMART Recovery, or the Self-Management and Recovery Training program, is group-based and uses professional clinicians to facilitate discussion and foster mutual support for a range of addictive behaviours, alongside Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Motivational Interviewing techniques. This paper reports on the qualitative component of this study and how participants perceive ROMs, and the potential shift to technological resources. Twenty semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with participants from SMART Recovery groups across New South Wales, Australia. Participants discussed their use of mutual support within group meetings to manage their recovery, including: naming their goals in front of peers; learning from clinicians and group discussion; and developing reciprocal and caring relationships. They also described any previous experience with routine outcomes measures and how digital technologies might enhance or hinder group function. Participants valued mutual support groups and reported that digital technologies could be complementary to physical, weekly group meetings. They were also concerned that the introduction of technological resources might pose a threat to physical meetings, thereby risking their access to mutual support. Findings have implications for the implementation of ROM when delivered via digital mechanisms, and indicate threats and opportunities that warrant consideration for future initiatives.",
keywords = "Addiction, mHealth, Mutual support, Qualitative, Routine outcome monitoring, SMART Recovery",
author = "Gray, {Rebecca M.} and Kelly, {Peter J.} and Beck, {Alison K.} and Baker, {Amanda L.} and Deane, {Frank P.} and Joanne Neale and Carla Treloar and Leanne Hides and Victoria Manning and Anthony Shakeshaft and John Kelly and Angela Argent and Ryan McGlaughlin",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106144",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Gray, RM, Kelly, PJ, Beck, AK, Baker, AL, Deane, FP, Neale, J, Treloar, C, Hides, L, Manning, V, Shakeshaft, A, Kelly, J, Argent, A & McGlaughlin, R 2020, 'A qualitative exploration of SMART Recovery meetings in Australia and the role of a digital platform to support routine outcome monitoring', Addictive Behaviors, vol. 101, 106144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106144

A qualitative exploration of SMART Recovery meetings in Australia and the role of a digital platform to support routine outcome monitoring. / Gray, Rebecca M.; Kelly, Peter J.; Beck, Alison K.; Baker, Amanda L.; Deane, Frank P.; Neale, Joanne; Treloar, Carla; Hides, Leanne; Manning, Victoria; Shakeshaft, Anthony; Kelly, John; Argent, Angela; McGlaughlin, Ryan.

In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 101, 106144, 01.02.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative exploration of SMART Recovery meetings in Australia and the role of a digital platform to support routine outcome monitoring

AU - Gray, Rebecca M.

AU - Kelly, Peter J.

AU - Beck, Alison K.

AU - Baker, Amanda L.

AU - Deane, Frank P.

AU - Neale, Joanne

AU - Treloar, Carla

AU - Hides, Leanne

AU - Manning, Victoria

AU - Shakeshaft, Anthony

AU - Kelly, John

AU - Argent, Angela

AU - McGlaughlin, Ryan

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Previous research has reported on the benefits of mutual support groups. However, such groups do not routinely collect data on participant outcomes. Moreover, the effect of collecting outcomes measures on these groups is unknown. The objective of this mixed methods study was to elicit participant views on using a novel, purpose built digital platform for routine outcome monitoring (ROM) as a standard component of a mutual support group. SMART Recovery, or the Self-Management and Recovery Training program, is group-based and uses professional clinicians to facilitate discussion and foster mutual support for a range of addictive behaviours, alongside Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Motivational Interviewing techniques. This paper reports on the qualitative component of this study and how participants perceive ROMs, and the potential shift to technological resources. Twenty semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with participants from SMART Recovery groups across New South Wales, Australia. Participants discussed their use of mutual support within group meetings to manage their recovery, including: naming their goals in front of peers; learning from clinicians and group discussion; and developing reciprocal and caring relationships. They also described any previous experience with routine outcomes measures and how digital technologies might enhance or hinder group function. Participants valued mutual support groups and reported that digital technologies could be complementary to physical, weekly group meetings. They were also concerned that the introduction of technological resources might pose a threat to physical meetings, thereby risking their access to mutual support. Findings have implications for the implementation of ROM when delivered via digital mechanisms, and indicate threats and opportunities that warrant consideration for future initiatives.

AB - Previous research has reported on the benefits of mutual support groups. However, such groups do not routinely collect data on participant outcomes. Moreover, the effect of collecting outcomes measures on these groups is unknown. The objective of this mixed methods study was to elicit participant views on using a novel, purpose built digital platform for routine outcome monitoring (ROM) as a standard component of a mutual support group. SMART Recovery, or the Self-Management and Recovery Training program, is group-based and uses professional clinicians to facilitate discussion and foster mutual support for a range of addictive behaviours, alongside Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Motivational Interviewing techniques. This paper reports on the qualitative component of this study and how participants perceive ROMs, and the potential shift to technological resources. Twenty semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with participants from SMART Recovery groups across New South Wales, Australia. Participants discussed their use of mutual support within group meetings to manage their recovery, including: naming their goals in front of peers; learning from clinicians and group discussion; and developing reciprocal and caring relationships. They also described any previous experience with routine outcomes measures and how digital technologies might enhance or hinder group function. Participants valued mutual support groups and reported that digital technologies could be complementary to physical, weekly group meetings. They were also concerned that the introduction of technological resources might pose a threat to physical meetings, thereby risking their access to mutual support. Findings have implications for the implementation of ROM when delivered via digital mechanisms, and indicate threats and opportunities that warrant consideration for future initiatives.

KW - Addiction

KW - mHealth

KW - Mutual support

KW - Qualitative

KW - Routine outcome monitoring

KW - SMART Recovery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073605631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106144

DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106144

M3 - Article

VL - 101

JO - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

M1 - 106144

ER -