TY - JOUR
T1 - A new one-stop interdisciplinary cognitive clinic model tackles rural health inequality and halves the time to diagnosis
T2 - Benchmarked against a national dementia registry
AU - Alty, Jane
AU - Lawler, Katherine
AU - Salmon, Katharine
AU - McDonald, Scott
AU - Stuart, Kimberley
AU - Cleary, Alison
AU - Ma, Jak
AU - Rudd, Kaylee
AU - Wang, Xinyi
AU - Chiranakorn-Costa, Sigourney
AU - Collins, Jessica
AU - Merl, Helga
AU - Lin, Xiaoping
AU - Vickers, James C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported by the J.O. and J.R. Wicking Trust (Equity Trustees), the University of Tasmania and the Australian Dementia Network (ADNeT). ADNeT is funded by the Australian National Health and Medicine Research Council. The funding bodies have no direct role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation or manuscript preparation. Open access publishing facilitated by University of Tasmania, as part of the Wiley - University of Tasmania agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
Funding Information:
This research is supported by the J.O. and J.R. Wicking Trust (Equity Trustees), the University of Tasmania and the Australian Dementia Network (ADNeT). ADNeT is funded by the Australian National Health and Medicine Research Council. The funding bodies have no direct role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation or manuscript preparation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Objectives: Unequal access to cognitive assessments is a major barrier to timely diagnosis, especially for those living in rural or remote areas. ‘One-stop’ cognitive clinic models are a proposed solution, but few such clinics exist. We evaluate the implementation of a new one-stop State-wide clinic model in Tasmania, Australia, where 27% of people live in rural/remote areas. Methods: A novel single-visit protocol has been developed, comprising interdisciplinary medical and cognitive assessments, research participation, consensus diagnosis and management plan. A cross-sectional evaluation was undertaken using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework and results benchmarked against the national Australian Dementia Network Registry. Results: Over the first 52 consecutive weekly clinics: Reach: 130 adults were assessed (mean age [SD] 70.12 years [10.31]; 59.2% female) with 40 (36.8%) from rural/remote areas. Effectiveness: 98.5% (128/130) received a same-day diagnosis: 30.1% (n = 40) Subjective Cognitive Decline, 35.4% (46) Mild Cognitive Impairment, 33.1% (43) dementia and one case inconclusive. Adoption: 22.9% (156) of General Practitioners referred patients. Implementation: Nearly all ‘ideal’ diagnostic clinical practices were met and >90% of surveyed patients reported ‘good/very good’ clinic experience. The wait from referral to diagnosis was 2 months shorter than other national Registry clinics (78 vs. 133 days). Conclusions: This ‘one-stop’ model provides an interdisciplinary consensus cognitive diagnosis quickly and is well accepted; this may reduce health inequities especially for people living in rural/remote areas. This cognitive clinic model may be of relevance to other centres worldwide and also provides a rich data source for research studies.
AB - Objectives: Unequal access to cognitive assessments is a major barrier to timely diagnosis, especially for those living in rural or remote areas. ‘One-stop’ cognitive clinic models are a proposed solution, but few such clinics exist. We evaluate the implementation of a new one-stop State-wide clinic model in Tasmania, Australia, where 27% of people live in rural/remote areas. Methods: A novel single-visit protocol has been developed, comprising interdisciplinary medical and cognitive assessments, research participation, consensus diagnosis and management plan. A cross-sectional evaluation was undertaken using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework and results benchmarked against the national Australian Dementia Network Registry. Results: Over the first 52 consecutive weekly clinics: Reach: 130 adults were assessed (mean age [SD] 70.12 years [10.31]; 59.2% female) with 40 (36.8%) from rural/remote areas. Effectiveness: 98.5% (128/130) received a same-day diagnosis: 30.1% (n = 40) Subjective Cognitive Decline, 35.4% (46) Mild Cognitive Impairment, 33.1% (43) dementia and one case inconclusive. Adoption: 22.9% (156) of General Practitioners referred patients. Implementation: Nearly all ‘ideal’ diagnostic clinical practices were met and >90% of surveyed patients reported ‘good/very good’ clinic experience. The wait from referral to diagnosis was 2 months shorter than other national Registry clinics (78 vs. 133 days). Conclusions: This ‘one-stop’ model provides an interdisciplinary consensus cognitive diagnosis quickly and is well accepted; this may reduce health inequities especially for people living in rural/remote areas. This cognitive clinic model may be of relevance to other centres worldwide and also provides a rich data source for research studies.
KW - cognition
KW - dementia
KW - diagnosis
KW - health service equity
KW - implementation science
KW - ISLAND
KW - mild cognitive impairment
KW - multidisciplinary
KW - neurocognitive disorders
KW - rural health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168277914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/gps.5988
DO - 10.1002/gps.5988
M3 - Article
C2 - 37592719
AN - SCOPUS:85168277914
SN - 0885-6230
VL - 38
JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
IS - 8
M1 - e5988
ER -