A New Method for Estimating the Incidence of Infectious Diseases

Hamish McManus, Denton Callander, Jason Asselin, James McMahon, Jennifer F. Hoy, David J. Templeton, Christopher K. Fairley, Basil Donovan, Alisa E. Pedrana, Phillip Keen, David P. Wilson, Julian Elliott, John Kaldor, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Kathy Petoumenos, Martin Holt, Margaret E. Hellard, Andrew E. Grulich, Andrew Carr, Mark A. StooveRebecca J. Guy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ambitious World Health Organization targets for disease elimination require monitoring of epidemics using routine health data in settings of decreasing and low incidence. We evaluated 2 methods commonly applied to routine testing results to estimate incidence rates that assume a uniform probability of infection between consecutive negative and positive tests based on 1) the midpoint of this interval and 2) a randomly selected point in this interval. We compared these with an approximation of the Poisson binomial distribution, which assigns partial incidence to time periods based on the uniform probability of occurrence in these intervals. We assessed bias, variance, and convergence of estimates using simulations of Weibull-distributed failure times with systematically varied baseline incidence and varying trend. We considered results for quarterly, half-yearly, and yearly incidence estimation frequencies. We applied the methods to assess human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence in HIV-negative patients from the Treatment With Antiretrovirals and Their Impact on Positive and Negative Men (TAIPAN) Study, an Australian study of HIV incidence in men who have sex with men, between 2012 and 2018. The Poisson binomial method had reduced bias and variance at low levels of incidence and for increased estimation frequency, with increased consistency of estimation. Application of methods to real-world assessment of HIV incidence found decreased variance in Poisson binomial model estimates, with observed incidence declining to levels where simulation results had indicated bias in midpoint and random-point methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1386-1395
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume190
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • disease incidence rates
  • longitudinal data
  • Poisson binomial distribution
  • routine diagnostic testing

Cite this