A new instrument for targeting falls prevention interventions was accurate and clinically applicable in a hospital setting

Terrence Peter Haines, Kim L Bennell, Richard Harry Osborne, Keith Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objective: to describe the diagnostic accuracy and practical application of the Peter James Centre Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PJC-FRAT), a multidiscriplinary falls risk screening and intervention deployment instrument. Methods: In phase 1, the accuracy of the PJC-FRAT was prospectively compared to a gold standard (the STRATIFY) on a cohort of subacute hospital patients (n = 122). In phase 2, the PJC-FRAT was temporally reassessed using a subsequent cohort (n = 316), with results compared to those of phase 1. Primary outcomes were falls (events), fallers (patients who fell), and hospital completion rates of the PJC-FRAT). Results. In phase 1, PJC-FRAT accuracy of identifying fallers showed sensitivity of 73 (bootstrap 95 confidence interval CI = 55, 90) and specificity of 75 (95 CI = 66, 83), compared with the STRATIFY (cutoff > 2/5) sensitivity of 77 (95 CI = 59, 92) and specificity of 51 (95 CI = 41, 61). This difference was not significant. In phase 2, accuracy of nursing staff using the PJC-FRAT was lower. PJC-FRAT completion rates varied among disciplines over both phases: nurses and physiotherapists, >90 ; occupational therapists, > 82 ; and medical officers, >57 . Conclusion: The PJC-FRAT was practical and relatively accurate as a predictor of falls and a deployment instrument for falls prevention interventions, although continued staff education may be necessary to maintain its accuracy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168 - 175
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Cite this

@article{d8089bff8a924379be8f0a77e1a90d52,
title = "A new instrument for targeting falls prevention interventions was accurate and clinically applicable in a hospital setting",
abstract = "Background and objective: to describe the diagnostic accuracy and practical application of the Peter James Centre Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PJC-FRAT), a multidiscriplinary falls risk screening and intervention deployment instrument. Methods: In phase 1, the accuracy of the PJC-FRAT was prospectively compared to a gold standard (the STRATIFY) on a cohort of subacute hospital patients (n = 122). In phase 2, the PJC-FRAT was temporally reassessed using a subsequent cohort (n = 316), with results compared to those of phase 1. Primary outcomes were falls (events), fallers (patients who fell), and hospital completion rates of the PJC-FRAT). Results. In phase 1, PJC-FRAT accuracy of identifying fallers showed sensitivity of 73 (bootstrap 95 confidence interval CI = 55, 90) and specificity of 75 (95 CI = 66, 83), compared with the STRATIFY (cutoff > 2/5) sensitivity of 77 (95 CI = 59, 92) and specificity of 51 (95 CI = 41, 61). This difference was not significant. In phase 2, accuracy of nursing staff using the PJC-FRAT was lower. PJC-FRAT completion rates varied among disciplines over both phases: nurses and physiotherapists, >90 ; occupational therapists, > 82 ; and medical officers, >57 . Conclusion: The PJC-FRAT was practical and relatively accurate as a predictor of falls and a deployment instrument for falls prevention interventions, although continued staff education may be necessary to maintain its accuracy.",
author = "Haines, {Terrence Peter} and Bennell, {Kim L} and Osborne, {Richard Harry} and Keith Hill",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.017",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "168 -- 175",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

A new instrument for targeting falls prevention interventions was accurate and clinically applicable in a hospital setting. / Haines, Terrence Peter; Bennell, Kim L; Osborne, Richard Harry; Hill, Keith.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2006, p. 168 - 175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new instrument for targeting falls prevention interventions was accurate and clinically applicable in a hospital setting

AU - Haines, Terrence Peter

AU - Bennell, Kim L

AU - Osborne, Richard Harry

AU - Hill, Keith

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Background and objective: to describe the diagnostic accuracy and practical application of the Peter James Centre Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PJC-FRAT), a multidiscriplinary falls risk screening and intervention deployment instrument. Methods: In phase 1, the accuracy of the PJC-FRAT was prospectively compared to a gold standard (the STRATIFY) on a cohort of subacute hospital patients (n = 122). In phase 2, the PJC-FRAT was temporally reassessed using a subsequent cohort (n = 316), with results compared to those of phase 1. Primary outcomes were falls (events), fallers (patients who fell), and hospital completion rates of the PJC-FRAT). Results. In phase 1, PJC-FRAT accuracy of identifying fallers showed sensitivity of 73 (bootstrap 95 confidence interval CI = 55, 90) and specificity of 75 (95 CI = 66, 83), compared with the STRATIFY (cutoff > 2/5) sensitivity of 77 (95 CI = 59, 92) and specificity of 51 (95 CI = 41, 61). This difference was not significant. In phase 2, accuracy of nursing staff using the PJC-FRAT was lower. PJC-FRAT completion rates varied among disciplines over both phases: nurses and physiotherapists, >90 ; occupational therapists, > 82 ; and medical officers, >57 . Conclusion: The PJC-FRAT was practical and relatively accurate as a predictor of falls and a deployment instrument for falls prevention interventions, although continued staff education may be necessary to maintain its accuracy.

AB - Background and objective: to describe the diagnostic accuracy and practical application of the Peter James Centre Falls Risk Assessment Tool (PJC-FRAT), a multidiscriplinary falls risk screening and intervention deployment instrument. Methods: In phase 1, the accuracy of the PJC-FRAT was prospectively compared to a gold standard (the STRATIFY) on a cohort of subacute hospital patients (n = 122). In phase 2, the PJC-FRAT was temporally reassessed using a subsequent cohort (n = 316), with results compared to those of phase 1. Primary outcomes were falls (events), fallers (patients who fell), and hospital completion rates of the PJC-FRAT). Results. In phase 1, PJC-FRAT accuracy of identifying fallers showed sensitivity of 73 (bootstrap 95 confidence interval CI = 55, 90) and specificity of 75 (95 CI = 66, 83), compared with the STRATIFY (cutoff > 2/5) sensitivity of 77 (95 CI = 59, 92) and specificity of 51 (95 CI = 41, 61). This difference was not significant. In phase 2, accuracy of nursing staff using the PJC-FRAT was lower. PJC-FRAT completion rates varied among disciplines over both phases: nurses and physiotherapists, >90 ; occupational therapists, > 82 ; and medical officers, >57 . Conclusion: The PJC-FRAT was practical and relatively accurate as a predictor of falls and a deployment instrument for falls prevention interventions, although continued staff education may be necessary to maintain its accuracy.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16426952

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.017

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 168

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 2

ER -