A New Approach to Testing Asset Pricing Models

The Bilinear Paradigm

Stephen J. Brown, Mark I. Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a new approach to estimating and testing asset pricing models in the context of a bilinear paradigm introduced by Kruskal [18]. This approach is both simple and at the same time quite general. As an illustration we apply it to the special case of the arbitrage pricing model where the number of factors is pre‐specified. The data appear to be generally in conflict with a five or seven factor representation of the model used by Roll and Ross [30]. When we consider the number of replications of our test and the large number of observations on which it is performed, the frequency with which we reject the three factor APM does not lead us to conclude that this model is unrepresentative of security returns. Further, the rejection of the five and seven factor versions is to be expected if the three factor version is correct. The paradigm gives insight into the appropriate specification of the model and suggests that there may be a small number of economy wide factors that affect security returns. 1983 The American Finance Association

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)711-743
Number of pages33
JournalThe Journal of Finance
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1983

Cite this

@article{f2d5b9d780bd457eb960b3ebab491bc6,
title = "A New Approach to Testing Asset Pricing Models: The Bilinear Paradigm",
abstract = "We propose a new approach to estimating and testing asset pricing models in the context of a bilinear paradigm introduced by Kruskal [18]. This approach is both simple and at the same time quite general. As an illustration we apply it to the special case of the arbitrage pricing model where the number of factors is pre‐specified. The data appear to be generally in conflict with a five or seven factor representation of the model used by Roll and Ross [30]. When we consider the number of replications of our test and the large number of observations on which it is performed, the frequency with which we reject the three factor APM does not lead us to conclude that this model is unrepresentative of security returns. Further, the rejection of the five and seven factor versions is to be expected if the three factor version is correct. The paradigm gives insight into the appropriate specification of the model and suggests that there may be a small number of economy wide factors that affect security returns. 1983 The American Finance Association",
author = "Brown, {Stephen J.} and Weinstein, {Mark I.}",
year = "1983",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02498.x",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "711--743",
journal = "Journal of Finance",
issn = "0022-1082",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

A New Approach to Testing Asset Pricing Models : The Bilinear Paradigm. / Brown, Stephen J.; Weinstein, Mark I.

In: The Journal of Finance, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.01.1983, p. 711-743.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A New Approach to Testing Asset Pricing Models

T2 - The Bilinear Paradigm

AU - Brown, Stephen J.

AU - Weinstein, Mark I.

PY - 1983/1/1

Y1 - 1983/1/1

N2 - We propose a new approach to estimating and testing asset pricing models in the context of a bilinear paradigm introduced by Kruskal [18]. This approach is both simple and at the same time quite general. As an illustration we apply it to the special case of the arbitrage pricing model where the number of factors is pre‐specified. The data appear to be generally in conflict with a five or seven factor representation of the model used by Roll and Ross [30]. When we consider the number of replications of our test and the large number of observations on which it is performed, the frequency with which we reject the three factor APM does not lead us to conclude that this model is unrepresentative of security returns. Further, the rejection of the five and seven factor versions is to be expected if the three factor version is correct. The paradigm gives insight into the appropriate specification of the model and suggests that there may be a small number of economy wide factors that affect security returns. 1983 The American Finance Association

AB - We propose a new approach to estimating and testing asset pricing models in the context of a bilinear paradigm introduced by Kruskal [18]. This approach is both simple and at the same time quite general. As an illustration we apply it to the special case of the arbitrage pricing model where the number of factors is pre‐specified. The data appear to be generally in conflict with a five or seven factor representation of the model used by Roll and Ross [30]. When we consider the number of replications of our test and the large number of observations on which it is performed, the frequency with which we reject the three factor APM does not lead us to conclude that this model is unrepresentative of security returns. Further, the rejection of the five and seven factor versions is to be expected if the three factor version is correct. The paradigm gives insight into the appropriate specification of the model and suggests that there may be a small number of economy wide factors that affect security returns. 1983 The American Finance Association

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944833063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02498.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02498.x

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 711

EP - 743

JO - Journal of Finance

JF - Journal of Finance

SN - 0022-1082

IS - 3

ER -