TY - JOUR
T1 - A new approach for assessing groundwater recharge by combining GRACE and baseflow with case studies in karst areas of southwest China
AU - Huang, Zhiyong
AU - Yeh, Pat J.F.
AU - Jiao, Jiu Jimmy
AU - Luo, Xin
AU - Pan, Yun
AU - Long, Yuannan
AU - Zhang, Chong
AU - Zheng, Longqun
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project Nos. 17303519 and 17307620), the Natural Science Foundation, Hunan province, China (Project No. 2022JJ40480), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 41877172 and 52079010), the Seed fund program granted to HKU‐ZIRI, and Seed Fund for Basic Research for New Staff of HKU granted to L.X. We appreciate Dr. H. M. Schmied (email: [email protected] ) at Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe‐University Frankfurt for providing WGHM‐simulated soil moisture storage and surface water storage data. We thank the China Meteorological Administration (email: [email protected] ) for sharing in situ monthly precipitation data. We appreciate Dr. Y. Zhu at Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS for sharing in situ GW‐level data in southwest China. We are grateful to Prof. Dr. B. R. Scanlon for her kind help on revising the language of this paper. We thank Dr. Antóin M. O’Sullivan, two anonymous reviewers, and the associate editor for their insightful comments that have improved the quality of this paper.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project Nos. 17303519 and 17307620), the Natural Science Foundation, Hunan province, China (Project No. 2022JJ40480), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 41877172 and 52079010), the Seed fund program granted to HKU-ZIRI, and Seed Fund for Basic Research for New Staff of HKU granted to L.X. We appreciate Dr. H. M. Schmied (email: [email protected]) at Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe-University Frankfurt for providing WGHM-simulated soil moisture storage and surface water storage data. We thank the China Meteorological Administration (email: [email protected]) for sharing in situ monthly precipitation data. We appreciate Dr. Y. Zhu at Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS for sharing in situ GW-level data in southwest China. We are grateful to Prof. Dr. B. R. Scanlon for her kind help on revising the language of this paper. We thank Dr. Antóin M. O’Sullivan, two anonymous reviewers, and the associate editor for their insightful comments that have improved the quality of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. The Authors.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - A new approach combining groundwater storage change (GWSC) derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite data and baseflow was proposed to estimate groundwater recharge at large spatial scales but a short (monthly) time scale. This method was applied in two typical karst basins of southwest China, the Wujiang River basin (WRB, ∼87,900 km2, ∼70% karstification) and Xijiang River Basin (XRB, ∼360,000 km2, ∼44% karstification). The 2006–2012 monthly baseflow was first separated from in situ streamflow through multivariate regression analysis. Groundwater recharge was estimated using separated baseflow and GWSC estimated from GRACE data and observation-based groundwater-level data. The comparison between GRACE- and observation-based recharge in the larger XRB shows better consistency, while that in the smaller WRB shows larger discrepancies. Considering the associated uncertainty (60–93 mm/yr), the 2006–2012 mean recharge in two basins, ranging 199–225 mm/yr (17%–19% of precipitation) is comparable to bulletin-reported estimates (∼145 mm/yr). Both the degree of karstification and aquifer water table depth influence recharge and discharge processes in karst areas of southwest China. The more karstic WRB exhibits more rapid infiltration (due to more developed permeable epikarst zone) and higher discharge capability (due to more developed underground drainage systems), particularly during dry periods (2009, 2011, and winter). Baseflow exhibits a shorter time lag to recharge and GWSC in the XRB than WRB owing to more quick flow, lower storage with more rapid infiltration, and shorter mean groundwater residence time. Observation-based monthly recharge reflects different rainfall-infiltration-runoff processes under different rainfall intensities, particularly in the WRB.
AB - A new approach combining groundwater storage change (GWSC) derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite data and baseflow was proposed to estimate groundwater recharge at large spatial scales but a short (monthly) time scale. This method was applied in two typical karst basins of southwest China, the Wujiang River basin (WRB, ∼87,900 km2, ∼70% karstification) and Xijiang River Basin (XRB, ∼360,000 km2, ∼44% karstification). The 2006–2012 monthly baseflow was first separated from in situ streamflow through multivariate regression analysis. Groundwater recharge was estimated using separated baseflow and GWSC estimated from GRACE data and observation-based groundwater-level data. The comparison between GRACE- and observation-based recharge in the larger XRB shows better consistency, while that in the smaller WRB shows larger discrepancies. Considering the associated uncertainty (60–93 mm/yr), the 2006–2012 mean recharge in two basins, ranging 199–225 mm/yr (17%–19% of precipitation) is comparable to bulletin-reported estimates (∼145 mm/yr). Both the degree of karstification and aquifer water table depth influence recharge and discharge processes in karst areas of southwest China. The more karstic WRB exhibits more rapid infiltration (due to more developed permeable epikarst zone) and higher discharge capability (due to more developed underground drainage systems), particularly during dry periods (2009, 2011, and winter). Baseflow exhibits a shorter time lag to recharge and GWSC in the XRB than WRB owing to more quick flow, lower storage with more rapid infiltration, and shorter mean groundwater residence time. Observation-based monthly recharge reflects different rainfall-infiltration-runoff processes under different rainfall intensities, particularly in the WRB.
KW - baseflow separation
KW - GRACE
KW - groundwater recharge
KW - groundwater storage change
KW - karst
KW - water table depth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148729500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2022WR032091
DO - 10.1029/2022WR032091
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148729500
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 59
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 2
M1 - e2022WR032091
ER -