A million Winslows

private liability of universities for ragging in India

Neerav Srivastava, Aashish Srivastava, D. K. Srivastava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Ragging has become a serious social evil. Millions of university students are ragged in India every year. While a perpetrator can be sued by the victim; it has not dented the escalation of ragging. Holding institutions responsible for preventing ragging is the only way to curb it. This can be by way of both public and private accountability of universities. The paper focuses on the latter. We submit a victim of ragging can sue the university for failure to prevent ragging for breach of the university–student contract, for negligence, under vicarious liability, breach of statutory duty, contravention of a non-delegable duty, and on the basis of misfeasance in public office by a rogue university officer. A private action will have a salutary effect on society, in particular universities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-262
Number of pages36
JournalOxford University Commonwealth Law Journal
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • breach of statutory duty
  • contract
  • non-delegable duty
  • tort
  • Universities
  • vicarious liability

Cite this

@article{52a654a25c3f4a30ab54d66c728d2735,
title = "A million Winslows: private liability of universities for ragging in India",
abstract = "Ragging has become a serious social evil. Millions of university students are ragged in India every year. While a perpetrator can be sued by the victim; it has not dented the escalation of ragging. Holding institutions responsible for preventing ragging is the only way to curb it. This can be by way of both public and private accountability of universities. The paper focuses on the latter. We submit a victim of ragging can sue the university for failure to prevent ragging for breach of the university–student contract, for negligence, under vicarious liability, breach of statutory duty, contravention of a non-delegable duty, and on the basis of misfeasance in public office by a rogue university officer. A private action will have a salutary effect on society, in particular universities.",
keywords = "breach of statutory duty, contract, non-delegable duty, tort, Universities, vicarious liability",
author = "Neerav Srivastava and Aashish Srivastava and Srivastava, {D. K.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/14729342.2019.1678101",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "227--262",
journal = "Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal",
issn = "1472-9342",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

A million Winslows : private liability of universities for ragging in India. / Srivastava, Neerav; Srivastava, Aashish; Srivastava, D. K.

In: Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2019, p. 227-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A million Winslows

T2 - private liability of universities for ragging in India

AU - Srivastava, Neerav

AU - Srivastava, Aashish

AU - Srivastava, D. K.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Ragging has become a serious social evil. Millions of university students are ragged in India every year. While a perpetrator can be sued by the victim; it has not dented the escalation of ragging. Holding institutions responsible for preventing ragging is the only way to curb it. This can be by way of both public and private accountability of universities. The paper focuses on the latter. We submit a victim of ragging can sue the university for failure to prevent ragging for breach of the university–student contract, for negligence, under vicarious liability, breach of statutory duty, contravention of a non-delegable duty, and on the basis of misfeasance in public office by a rogue university officer. A private action will have a salutary effect on society, in particular universities.

AB - Ragging has become a serious social evil. Millions of university students are ragged in India every year. While a perpetrator can be sued by the victim; it has not dented the escalation of ragging. Holding institutions responsible for preventing ragging is the only way to curb it. This can be by way of both public and private accountability of universities. The paper focuses on the latter. We submit a victim of ragging can sue the university for failure to prevent ragging for breach of the university–student contract, for negligence, under vicarious liability, breach of statutory duty, contravention of a non-delegable duty, and on the basis of misfeasance in public office by a rogue university officer. A private action will have a salutary effect on society, in particular universities.

KW - breach of statutory duty

KW - contract

KW - non-delegable duty

KW - tort

KW - Universities

KW - vicarious liability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074657284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14729342.2019.1678101

DO - 10.1080/14729342.2019.1678101

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 227

EP - 262

JO - Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal

JF - Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal

SN - 1472-9342

IS - 2

ER -