TY - JOUR
T1 - A method for independent component graph analysis of resting-state fMRI
AU - Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius
AU - Ziegler, Erik
AU - Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M.
AU - Das, Tushar K.
AU - Cavaliere, Carlo
AU - Aiello, Marco
AU - Heine, Lizette
AU - di Perri, Carol
AU - Demertzi, Athena
AU - Noirhomme, Quentin
AU - Charland-Verville, Vanessa
AU - Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey
AU - Stender, Johan
AU - Gomez, Francisco
AU - Tshibanda, Jean Flory L.
AU - Laureys, Steven
AU - Owen, Adrian M.
AU - Soddu, Andrea
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Canada Excellence Research Chairs (CERC), the James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF) programs, a discovery grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research, the University of Liege, the Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation, the Leon Fredericq Foundation, the Belgian Inter-University Attraction Program, the Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and Biotechnology program, and the Marie Curie Initial Training Network in Neurophysics (PITN-GA-2009-238593).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Introduction: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task-free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time-courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non-contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data. Objective: Here, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory. Methods: First, ICA was performed at the single-subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple-template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network “neuronal” properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between-node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group-level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network. Results: Network graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small-worldness. Conclusions: This novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well-recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well-established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength.
AB - Introduction: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task-free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time-courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non-contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data. Objective: Here, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory. Methods: First, ICA was performed at the single-subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple-template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network “neuronal” properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between-node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group-level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network. Results: Network graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small-worldness. Conclusions: This novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well-recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well-established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength.
KW - BOLD fMRI
KW - graph theory
KW - independent component analysis
KW - resting state
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013236808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/brb3.626
DO - 10.1002/brb3.626
M3 - Article
C2 - 28293468
AN - SCOPUS:85013236808
SN - 2162-3279
VL - 7
JO - Brain and Behavior
JF - Brain and Behavior
IS - 3
M1 - e00626
ER -