A meta-analysis and synthesis of public transport customer amenity valuation research

Chris De Gruyter, Graham Currie, Long T. Truong, Farhana Naznin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper synthesises published research concerned with the valuation of public transport customer amenities. It includes normalisation of published values to equivalent terms, a meta-analysis of factors influencing these values, a review of valuation methods and issues faced in applying these methods, and an identification of gaps in knowledge. Some 57 separate research publications in this area were identified. Valuation methods adopted included stated preference, revealed preference, customer ratings, priority evaluator, maximum difference scaling and benefit/value transfer. Of these, stated preference was the most common published approach, however in practice benefit/value transfer is the most common method to apply values in project appraisal. Key issues associated with valuation include substantial variation in values (which are often context dependant) and the adoption of different units for expressing values, thereby limiting their transferability. Some 556 separate customer amenity values were identified relating to 97 separate amenity types. Almost all valuations were below 2 minutes of equivalent in-vehicle travel time value. Meta-analysis identified five types of significant predictors of values (R2 = 0.23): study location (Scandinavia), valuation method (stated preference), mode (train/metro), amenity group (access) and journey stage (boarding/alighting). Future research needs to disaggregate valuations by market segment.

LanguageEnglish
Pages261-283
Number of pages23
JournalTransport Reviews
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • customer amenity
  • in-vehicle time
  • meta-analysis
  • Public transport
  • transit
  • valuation

Cite this

De Gruyter, Chris ; Currie, Graham ; Truong, Long T. ; Naznin, Farhana. / A meta-analysis and synthesis of public transport customer amenity valuation research. In: Transport Reviews. 2019 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 261-283.
@article{6b858947d0c64adc83984be62e1bc938,
title = "A meta-analysis and synthesis of public transport customer amenity valuation research",
abstract = "This paper synthesises published research concerned with the valuation of public transport customer amenities. It includes normalisation of published values to equivalent terms, a meta-analysis of factors influencing these values, a review of valuation methods and issues faced in applying these methods, and an identification of gaps in knowledge. Some 57 separate research publications in this area were identified. Valuation methods adopted included stated preference, revealed preference, customer ratings, priority evaluator, maximum difference scaling and benefit/value transfer. Of these, stated preference was the most common published approach, however in practice benefit/value transfer is the most common method to apply values in project appraisal. Key issues associated with valuation include substantial variation in values (which are often context dependant) and the adoption of different units for expressing values, thereby limiting their transferability. Some 556 separate customer amenity values were identified relating to 97 separate amenity types. Almost all valuations were below 2 minutes of equivalent in-vehicle travel time value. Meta-analysis identified five types of significant predictors of values (R2 = 0.23): study location (Scandinavia), valuation method (stated preference), mode (train/metro), amenity group (access) and journey stage (boarding/alighting). Future research needs to disaggregate valuations by market segment.",
keywords = "customer amenity, in-vehicle time, meta-analysis, Public transport, transit, valuation",
author = "{De Gruyter}, Chris and Graham Currie and Truong, {Long T.} and Farhana Naznin",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/01441647.2018.1461708",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "261--283",
journal = "Transport Reviews",
issn = "0144-1647",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

A meta-analysis and synthesis of public transport customer amenity valuation research. / De Gruyter, Chris; Currie, Graham; Truong, Long T.; Naznin, Farhana.

In: Transport Reviews, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2019, p. 261-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis and synthesis of public transport customer amenity valuation research

AU - De Gruyter, Chris

AU - Currie, Graham

AU - Truong, Long T.

AU - Naznin, Farhana

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This paper synthesises published research concerned with the valuation of public transport customer amenities. It includes normalisation of published values to equivalent terms, a meta-analysis of factors influencing these values, a review of valuation methods and issues faced in applying these methods, and an identification of gaps in knowledge. Some 57 separate research publications in this area were identified. Valuation methods adopted included stated preference, revealed preference, customer ratings, priority evaluator, maximum difference scaling and benefit/value transfer. Of these, stated preference was the most common published approach, however in practice benefit/value transfer is the most common method to apply values in project appraisal. Key issues associated with valuation include substantial variation in values (which are often context dependant) and the adoption of different units for expressing values, thereby limiting their transferability. Some 556 separate customer amenity values were identified relating to 97 separate amenity types. Almost all valuations were below 2 minutes of equivalent in-vehicle travel time value. Meta-analysis identified five types of significant predictors of values (R2 = 0.23): study location (Scandinavia), valuation method (stated preference), mode (train/metro), amenity group (access) and journey stage (boarding/alighting). Future research needs to disaggregate valuations by market segment.

AB - This paper synthesises published research concerned with the valuation of public transport customer amenities. It includes normalisation of published values to equivalent terms, a meta-analysis of factors influencing these values, a review of valuation methods and issues faced in applying these methods, and an identification of gaps in knowledge. Some 57 separate research publications in this area were identified. Valuation methods adopted included stated preference, revealed preference, customer ratings, priority evaluator, maximum difference scaling and benefit/value transfer. Of these, stated preference was the most common published approach, however in practice benefit/value transfer is the most common method to apply values in project appraisal. Key issues associated with valuation include substantial variation in values (which are often context dependant) and the adoption of different units for expressing values, thereby limiting their transferability. Some 556 separate customer amenity values were identified relating to 97 separate amenity types. Almost all valuations were below 2 minutes of equivalent in-vehicle travel time value. Meta-analysis identified five types of significant predictors of values (R2 = 0.23): study location (Scandinavia), valuation method (stated preference), mode (train/metro), amenity group (access) and journey stage (boarding/alighting). Future research needs to disaggregate valuations by market segment.

KW - customer amenity

KW - in-vehicle time

KW - meta-analysis

KW - Public transport

KW - transit

KW - valuation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045617723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01441647.2018.1461708

DO - 10.1080/01441647.2018.1461708

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 261

EP - 283

JO - Transport Reviews

T2 - Transport Reviews

JF - Transport Reviews

SN - 0144-1647

IS - 2

ER -