A manipulative test of competing theories for metabolic scaling

Craig White, Michael Kearney, Philip Matthews, Sebastiaan Kkooijman, Dustin Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reasons why metabolic rate (B) scales allometrically with body mass (M) remain hotly debated. The field is dominated by correlational analyses of the relationship between B and M; these struggle to disentangle competing explanations because both B and M are confounded with ontogeny, life history, and ecology. Here, we overcome these problems by using an experimental approach to test among competing metabolic theories. We examined the scaling of B in size-manipulated and intact colonies of a bryozoan and show that B scales with M-0.5. To explain this, we apply a general model based on the dynamic energy budget theory for metabolic organization that predicts B on the basis of energy allocation to assimilation, maintenance, growth, and maturation. Uniquely, this model predicts the absolute value of B, emphasizes that there is no single scaling exponent of B, and demonstrates that a single model can explain the variation in B seen in nature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)746 - 754
Number of pages9
JournalThe American Naturalist
Volume178
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Cite this