TY - JOUR
T1 - A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring
T2 - the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)
AU - Hawryluk, Gregory W.J.
AU - Aguilera, Sergio
AU - Buki, Andras
AU - Bulger, Eileen
AU - Citerio, Giuseppe
AU - Cooper, D. Jamie
AU - Arrastia, Ramon Diaz
AU - Diringer, Michael
AU - Figaji, Anthony
AU - Gao, Guoyi
AU - Geocadin, Romergryko
AU - Ghajar, Jamshid
AU - Harris, Odette
AU - Hoffer, Alan
AU - Hutchinson, Peter
AU - Joseph, Mathew
AU - Kitagawa, Ryan
AU - Manley, Geoffrey
AU - Mayer, Stephan
AU - Menon, David K.
AU - Meyfroidt, Geert
AU - Michael, Daniel B.
AU - Oddo, Mauro
AU - Okonkwo, David
AU - Patel, Mayur
AU - Robertson, Claudia
AU - Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.
AU - Rubiano, Andres M.
AU - Sahuquillo, Juan
AU - Servadei, Franco
AU - Shutter, Lori
AU - Stein, Deborah
AU - Stocchetti, Nino
AU - Taccone, Fabio Silvio
AU - Timmons, Shelly
AU - Tsai, Eve
AU - Ullman, Jamie S.
AU - Vespa, Paul
AU - Videtta, Walter
AU - Wright, David W.
AU - Zammit, Christopher
AU - Chesnut, Randall M.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Background: Management algorithms for adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) were omitted in later editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s sTBI Management Guidelines, as they were not evidence-based. Methods: We used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to address management of sTBI patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Forty-two experienced, clinically active sTBI specialists from six continents comprised the panel. Eight surveys iterated queries and comments. An in-person meeting included whole- and small-group discussions and blinded voting. Consensus required 80% agreement. We developed heatmaps based on a traffic-light model where panelists’ decision tendencies were the focus of recommendations. Results: We provide comprehensive algorithms for ICP-monitor-based adult sTBI management. Consensus established 18 interventions as fundamental and ten treatments not to be used. We provide a three-tier algorithm for treating elevated ICP. Treatments within a tier are considered empirically equivalent. Higher tiers involve higher risk therapies. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 include 10, 4, and 3 interventions, respectively. We include inter-tier considerations, and recommendations for critical neuroworsening to assist the recognition and treatment of declining patients. Novel elements include guidance for autoregulation-based ICP treatment based on MAP Challenge results, and two heatmaps to guide (1) ICP-monitor removal and (2) consideration of sedation holidays for neurological examination. Conclusions: Our modern and comprehensive sTBI-management protocol is designed to assist clinicians managing sTBI patients monitored with ICP-monitors alone. Consensus-based (class III evidence), it provides management recommendations based on combined expert opinion. It reflects neither a standard-of-care nor a substitute for thoughtful individualized management.
AB - Background: Management algorithms for adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) were omitted in later editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s sTBI Management Guidelines, as they were not evidence-based. Methods: We used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to address management of sTBI patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Forty-two experienced, clinically active sTBI specialists from six continents comprised the panel. Eight surveys iterated queries and comments. An in-person meeting included whole- and small-group discussions and blinded voting. Consensus required 80% agreement. We developed heatmaps based on a traffic-light model where panelists’ decision tendencies were the focus of recommendations. Results: We provide comprehensive algorithms for ICP-monitor-based adult sTBI management. Consensus established 18 interventions as fundamental and ten treatments not to be used. We provide a three-tier algorithm for treating elevated ICP. Treatments within a tier are considered empirically equivalent. Higher tiers involve higher risk therapies. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 include 10, 4, and 3 interventions, respectively. We include inter-tier considerations, and recommendations for critical neuroworsening to assist the recognition and treatment of declining patients. Novel elements include guidance for autoregulation-based ICP treatment based on MAP Challenge results, and two heatmaps to guide (1) ICP-monitor removal and (2) consideration of sedation holidays for neurological examination. Conclusions: Our modern and comprehensive sTBI-management protocol is designed to assist clinicians managing sTBI patients monitored with ICP-monitors alone. Consensus-based (class III evidence), it provides management recommendations based on combined expert opinion. It reflects neither a standard-of-care nor a substitute for thoughtful individualized management.
KW - Algorithm
KW - Brain injury
KW - Consensus
KW - Head trauma
KW - Intracranial pressure
KW - Protocol
KW - Seattle
KW - SIBICC
KW - Tiers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074474298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9
DO - 10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 31659383
AN - SCOPUS:85074474298
VL - 45
SP - 1783
EP - 1794
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
SN - 0342-4642
IS - 12
ER -