TY - JOUR
T1 - A longitudinal study of the impacts of a stay in a Prevention and Recovery Care service in Victoria, Australia
AU - Brophy, Lisa
AU - Fletcher, Justine
AU - Dawadi, Shrinkhala
AU - Reece, John
AU - Edan, Vrinda
AU - Enticott, Joanne
AU - Farhall, John
AU - Fossey, Ellie
AU - Hamilton, Bridget
AU - Harvey, Carol
AU - Meadows, Graham
AU - Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
AU - Morrisroe, Emma
AU - Newton, Richard
AU - Palmer, Victoria
AU - Vine, Ruth
AU - Waks, Shifra
AU - Pirkis, Jane
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This publication is based on data collected in the Building the Evidence Base for Prevention and Recovery Care (PARC) Services project. The project was funded by an NHMRC partnership grant (GNT1115907) in a partnership between academic institutions, Mental Health Community Support Services (MHCSS), clinical or area mental health service providers and the Victorian Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background: Prevention and Recovery Care services are residential sub-acute services in Victoria, Australia, guided by a commitment to recovery-oriented practice. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of this service model is limited, largely relying on small, localised evaluations. This study involved a state-wide investigation into the personal recovery, perceived needs for care, well-being and quality-of-life outcomes experienced by Prevention and Recovery Care services’ consumers. Methods: A longitudinal cohort design examined the trajectory of self-reported personal recovery and other outcomes for consumers in 19 Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care services over 4 time points (T1 – 1 week after admission; T2 – within 1 week of discharge; T3 – 6 months after discharge; T4 – 12 months after discharge). T2–T4 time frames were extended by approximately 3 weeks due to recruitment challenges. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery was the primary outcome measure. Results: At T1, 298 consumers were recruited. By T4, 114 remained in the study. Participants scored higher on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery at all three time points after T1. There were also sustained improvements on all secondary outcome measures. Improvements were then sustained at each subsequent post-intervention time point. Community inclusion and having needs for care met also improved. Conclusion: The findings provide a consistent picture of benefits for consumers using Prevention and Recovery Care services, with significant improvement in personal recovery, quality of life, mental health and well-being following an admission to a Prevention and Recovery Care service. Further attention needs to be given to how to sustain the gains made through a Prevention and Recovery Care service admission in the long term.
AB - Background: Prevention and Recovery Care services are residential sub-acute services in Victoria, Australia, guided by a commitment to recovery-oriented practice. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of this service model is limited, largely relying on small, localised evaluations. This study involved a state-wide investigation into the personal recovery, perceived needs for care, well-being and quality-of-life outcomes experienced by Prevention and Recovery Care services’ consumers. Methods: A longitudinal cohort design examined the trajectory of self-reported personal recovery and other outcomes for consumers in 19 Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care services over 4 time points (T1 – 1 week after admission; T2 – within 1 week of discharge; T3 – 6 months after discharge; T4 – 12 months after discharge). T2–T4 time frames were extended by approximately 3 weeks due to recruitment challenges. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery was the primary outcome measure. Results: At T1, 298 consumers were recruited. By T4, 114 remained in the study. Participants scored higher on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery at all three time points after T1. There were also sustained improvements on all secondary outcome measures. Improvements were then sustained at each subsequent post-intervention time point. Community inclusion and having needs for care met also improved. Conclusion: The findings provide a consistent picture of benefits for consumers using Prevention and Recovery Care services, with significant improvement in personal recovery, quality of life, mental health and well-being following an admission to a Prevention and Recovery Care service. Further attention needs to be given to how to sustain the gains made through a Prevention and Recovery Care service admission in the long term.
KW - consumer outcomes
KW - mental health
KW - prevention
KW - Recovery
KW - sub-acute
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191729196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00048674241242943
DO - 10.1177/00048674241242943
M3 - Article
C2 - 38679852
AN - SCOPUS:85191729196
SN - 0004-8674
VL - 58
SP - 615
EP - 626
JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -