A global analysis of elevational distribution of non-native versus native plants

Qinfeng Guo, Songlin Fei, Zehao Shen, Basil V. Iannone, Jonathan Knott, Steven L. Chown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Aim: Much is known about the elevational diversity patterns of native species and about the mechanisms that drive these patterns. A similar level of understanding is needed for non-native species. Using published data, we examine elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants and compare the resulting patterns with those observed for native plants. Location: Global. Methods: We compiled data from 65 case studies on elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants around the world (including 32 cases in which both non-native and native plants were sampled). We compared the elevational distributions (upper and lower limits, and extents) and diversity patterns of non-native and native species. Results: Compared to native plant species, the elevational diversity patterns of non-native plant species were more negative (47% vs. 13%) and less unimodal (44% vs. 84%). That is, non-native species richness tended to be highest at lower elevations, whereas native species richness peaked at mid-elevations. In cases where species richness for both non-native and native species on the same mountains showed unimodal patterns in relation to elevation, maximum values in species richness occurred at lower elevations for non-native species. Main conclusions: At present levels of invasion, non-native and native species show different patterns in both distribution and diversity along elevational gradients worldwide. However, our observations constitute a snapshot of ongoing, long-term invasion processes. As non-native species typically show strong associations with human activities, future changes in human population (e.g. growth and migration), land use and climate change may promote upward spread of non-native species and may thus increase risks of impact on native species and communities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)793-803
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Biogeography
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • diversity
  • elevational patterns
  • global change
  • human
  • non-native
  • plant invasions
  • species richness

Cite this

Guo, Qinfeng ; Fei, Songlin ; Shen, Zehao ; Iannone, Basil V. ; Knott, Jonathan ; Chown, Steven L. / A global analysis of elevational distribution of non-native versus native plants. In: Journal of Biogeography. 2018 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 793-803.
@article{7c77b488792a4766a3bb960c21436a14,
title = "A global analysis of elevational distribution of non-native versus native plants",
abstract = "Aim: Much is known about the elevational diversity patterns of native species and about the mechanisms that drive these patterns. A similar level of understanding is needed for non-native species. Using published data, we examine elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants and compare the resulting patterns with those observed for native plants. Location: Global. Methods: We compiled data from 65 case studies on elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants around the world (including 32 cases in which both non-native and native plants were sampled). We compared the elevational distributions (upper and lower limits, and extents) and diversity patterns of non-native and native species. Results: Compared to native plant species, the elevational diversity patterns of non-native plant species were more negative (47{\%} vs. 13{\%}) and less unimodal (44{\%} vs. 84{\%}). That is, non-native species richness tended to be highest at lower elevations, whereas native species richness peaked at mid-elevations. In cases where species richness for both non-native and native species on the same mountains showed unimodal patterns in relation to elevation, maximum values in species richness occurred at lower elevations for non-native species. Main conclusions: At present levels of invasion, non-native and native species show different patterns in both distribution and diversity along elevational gradients worldwide. However, our observations constitute a snapshot of ongoing, long-term invasion processes. As non-native species typically show strong associations with human activities, future changes in human population (e.g. growth and migration), land use and climate change may promote upward spread of non-native species and may thus increase risks of impact on native species and communities.",
keywords = "diversity, elevational patterns, global change, human, non-native, plant invasions, species richness",
author = "Qinfeng Guo and Songlin Fei and Zehao Shen and Iannone, {Basil V.} and Jonathan Knott and Chown, {Steven L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jbi.13145",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "793--803",
journal = "Journal of Biogeography",
issn = "0305-0270",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

A global analysis of elevational distribution of non-native versus native plants. / Guo, Qinfeng; Fei, Songlin; Shen, Zehao; Iannone, Basil V.; Knott, Jonathan; Chown, Steven L.

In: Journal of Biogeography, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 793-803.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A global analysis of elevational distribution of non-native versus native plants

AU - Guo, Qinfeng

AU - Fei, Songlin

AU - Shen, Zehao

AU - Iannone, Basil V.

AU - Knott, Jonathan

AU - Chown, Steven L.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Aim: Much is known about the elevational diversity patterns of native species and about the mechanisms that drive these patterns. A similar level of understanding is needed for non-native species. Using published data, we examine elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants and compare the resulting patterns with those observed for native plants. Location: Global. Methods: We compiled data from 65 case studies on elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants around the world (including 32 cases in which both non-native and native plants were sampled). We compared the elevational distributions (upper and lower limits, and extents) and diversity patterns of non-native and native species. Results: Compared to native plant species, the elevational diversity patterns of non-native plant species were more negative (47% vs. 13%) and less unimodal (44% vs. 84%). That is, non-native species richness tended to be highest at lower elevations, whereas native species richness peaked at mid-elevations. In cases where species richness for both non-native and native species on the same mountains showed unimodal patterns in relation to elevation, maximum values in species richness occurred at lower elevations for non-native species. Main conclusions: At present levels of invasion, non-native and native species show different patterns in both distribution and diversity along elevational gradients worldwide. However, our observations constitute a snapshot of ongoing, long-term invasion processes. As non-native species typically show strong associations with human activities, future changes in human population (e.g. growth and migration), land use and climate change may promote upward spread of non-native species and may thus increase risks of impact on native species and communities.

AB - Aim: Much is known about the elevational diversity patterns of native species and about the mechanisms that drive these patterns. A similar level of understanding is needed for non-native species. Using published data, we examine elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants and compare the resulting patterns with those observed for native plants. Location: Global. Methods: We compiled data from 65 case studies on elevational diversity patterns of non-native plants around the world (including 32 cases in which both non-native and native plants were sampled). We compared the elevational distributions (upper and lower limits, and extents) and diversity patterns of non-native and native species. Results: Compared to native plant species, the elevational diversity patterns of non-native plant species were more negative (47% vs. 13%) and less unimodal (44% vs. 84%). That is, non-native species richness tended to be highest at lower elevations, whereas native species richness peaked at mid-elevations. In cases where species richness for both non-native and native species on the same mountains showed unimodal patterns in relation to elevation, maximum values in species richness occurred at lower elevations for non-native species. Main conclusions: At present levels of invasion, non-native and native species show different patterns in both distribution and diversity along elevational gradients worldwide. However, our observations constitute a snapshot of ongoing, long-term invasion processes. As non-native species typically show strong associations with human activities, future changes in human population (e.g. growth and migration), land use and climate change may promote upward spread of non-native species and may thus increase risks of impact on native species and communities.

KW - diversity

KW - elevational patterns

KW - global change

KW - human

KW - non-native

KW - plant invasions

KW - species richness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040712914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jbi.13145

DO - 10.1111/jbi.13145

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 793

EP - 803

JO - Journal of Biogeography

JF - Journal of Biogeography

SN - 0305-0270

IS - 4

ER -