A framework for the development of bus service reliability measures

Zhenliang Ma, Luis Ferreira, Mahmoud Mesbah

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reliability of transit service has been recognized as a significant determinant of quality of service. Numerous indicators have been proposed by individual operational organizations and the research community dependent on specific objectives and resource constraints. Buffer time based indicators are highly desirable since they enable evaluation of the reliability impacts on passengers from an operational approach. However, buffer time indicators can underestimate passengers perceived reliability performance and hide the sources of observed changes in reliability if the buffer time is based on the total travel time distribution. Large samples of disaggregated data, benefiting from Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) system, provide great potential to measure reliability at very high levels of resolution. The paper proposes a buffer time concept based reliability measurement framework using AVL data, which can disaggregate service performance to a high level of detail. The framework working procedure is illustrated in the case of AVL data from Brisbane. Three example indicators for applications of reliability assessment (operators), journey planning (passenger) and value of time (agencies) are developed to fulfil different stakeholders' requirements.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes
EventAustralasian Transport Research Forum 2013 - Brisbane, Australia
Duration: 2 Oct 20134 Oct 2013
Conference number: 36th
https://www.australasiantransportresearchforum.org.au/papers/2013 (Proceedings)

Conference

ConferenceAustralasian Transport Research Forum 2013
Abbreviated titleATRF 2013
CountryAustralia
CityBrisbane
Period2/10/134/10/13
Internet address

Keywords

  • Buffer time concepts
  • Bus service reliability
  • Disaggregate service performance
  • Journey planning
  • Reliability assessment
  • Value of reliability

Cite this