TY - JOUR
T1 - A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization
AU - Miller, Daniel J.
AU - Paul, Donald R.
AU - Freeman, Benny D.
N1 - Funding Information:
D.J.M. would like to thank Ricardo H. Dunia (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin), whose patience, expertise, and generosity of time made possible the development of LabVIEW code used to control the apparatus described here. The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (0648993) and the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center for Layered Polymeric Systems (DMR-0423914).
Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/3/20
Y1 - 2013/3/20
N2 - Membrane fouling is often characterized using a crossflow filtration apparatus. Typically, the transmembrane pressure (TMP) difference is fixed, and the flux is allowed to decline as the membrane fouls and the resistance to mass transfer increases. However, as flux varies, so too does the rate at which foulants are brought to the membrane surface, so the observed fouling behavior is not solely the result of membranefoulant interactions. Constant flux experiments, where the permeate flux is fixed and the TMP difference varies, minimize such variations in the hydrodynamic conditions at the membrane surface, but constant TMP difference experiments dominate the fouling literature because they are more straightforward to execute than constant flux experiments. Additionally, most industrial water purification membrane installations operate at constant flux rather than at constant TMP. Here, we describe the construction and operation of a constant flux crossflow fouling apparatus. System measurement accuracy was validated by comparison of pure water permeance measurements to values specified by the membrane manufacturer, reported elsewhere, and measured by another technique. Fouling experiments were performed with two membranefoulant systems: polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes with a soybean oil emulsion foulant and PVDF microfiltration membranes with a polystyrene latex bead suspension foulant. Automatic permeate flux control facilitated flux stepping experiments, which are commonly used to determine the threshold flux or critical flux of a membranefoulant pair. Comparison of a flux stepping experiment with a literature report yielded good agreement.
AB - Membrane fouling is often characterized using a crossflow filtration apparatus. Typically, the transmembrane pressure (TMP) difference is fixed, and the flux is allowed to decline as the membrane fouls and the resistance to mass transfer increases. However, as flux varies, so too does the rate at which foulants are brought to the membrane surface, so the observed fouling behavior is not solely the result of membranefoulant interactions. Constant flux experiments, where the permeate flux is fixed and the TMP difference varies, minimize such variations in the hydrodynamic conditions at the membrane surface, but constant TMP difference experiments dominate the fouling literature because they are more straightforward to execute than constant flux experiments. Additionally, most industrial water purification membrane installations operate at constant flux rather than at constant TMP. Here, we describe the construction and operation of a constant flux crossflow fouling apparatus. System measurement accuracy was validated by comparison of pure water permeance measurements to values specified by the membrane manufacturer, reported elsewhere, and measured by another technique. Fouling experiments were performed with two membranefoulant systems: polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes with a soybean oil emulsion foulant and PVDF microfiltration membranes with a polystyrene latex bead suspension foulant. Automatic permeate flux control facilitated flux stepping experiments, which are commonly used to determine the threshold flux or critical flux of a membranefoulant pair. Comparison of a flux stepping experiment with a literature report yielded good agreement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875771078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1.4794909
DO - 10.1063/1.4794909
M3 - Article
C2 - 23556842
AN - SCOPUS:84875771078
SN - 0034-6748
VL - 84
JO - Review of Scientific Instruments
JF - Review of Scientific Instruments
IS - 3
M1 - 035003
ER -