TY - JOUR
T1 - A cross-sectional survey using electronic distribution of a questionnaire to subscribers of educational material written by clinicians, for clinicians, to evaluate whether practice change resulted from reading the Clinical Communiqué
AU - Cunningham, Nicola
AU - Pham, Tony
AU - Kennedy, Briohny
AU - Gillard, Alexander
AU - Ibrahim, Joseph
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Objective: To explore whether subscribers reported clinical practice changes as a result of reading the Clinical Communiqué (CC). Secondarily, to compare the characteristics of subscribers who self-reported changes to clinical practice with those who did not, and to explore subscribers' perceptions of the educational value of the CC. Design, setting and participants: Online cross-sectional survey between 21 July 2015 and 18 August 2015 by subscribers of the CC (response rate=29.9%, 1008/3373), conducted by a team from Monash University, Australia. Main outcome measures: Change in clinical practice as a result of reading the CC. Results: 53.0% of respondents reported that their practice had changed after reading the CC. Respondents also found that the CC raised awareness (96.5%) and provided ideas about improving patient safety and care (94.1%) leading them to discuss cases with their colleagues (79.6%) and review their practice (75.7%). Multivariate analysis indicated that working in a residential aged care facility (p<0.05) and having taken part in an inquest (p<0.05) were significantly associated with practice change. Conclusion: The design and content of the CC has generated a positive impact on the healthcare community. It is presented in a format that appears to be accessible and acceptable to readers and achieves its goals of promoting safer clinical care through greater awareness of the medico-legal context of practice.
AB - Objective: To explore whether subscribers reported clinical practice changes as a result of reading the Clinical Communiqué (CC). Secondarily, to compare the characteristics of subscribers who self-reported changes to clinical practice with those who did not, and to explore subscribers' perceptions of the educational value of the CC. Design, setting and participants: Online cross-sectional survey between 21 July 2015 and 18 August 2015 by subscribers of the CC (response rate=29.9%, 1008/3373), conducted by a team from Monash University, Australia. Main outcome measures: Change in clinical practice as a result of reading the CC. Results: 53.0% of respondents reported that their practice had changed after reading the CC. Respondents also found that the CC raised awareness (96.5%) and provided ideas about improving patient safety and care (94.1%) leading them to discuss cases with their colleagues (79.6%) and review their practice (75.7%). Multivariate analysis indicated that working in a residential aged care facility (p<0.05) and having taken part in an inquest (p<0.05) were significantly associated with practice change. Conclusion: The design and content of the CC has generated a positive impact on the healthcare community. It is presented in a format that appears to be accessible and acceptable to readers and achieves its goals of promoting safer clinical care through greater awareness of the medico-legal context of practice.
KW - coroners
KW - death prevention
KW - narrative case reports
KW - patient safety
KW - practice change
KW - printed educational material
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020022927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014064
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014064
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85020022927
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 7
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 5
M1 - e014064
ER -