A critical review of recent US market level health care strategy literature

Rebecca Wells, Jane Banaszak-Holl

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this review, we argue that it would be profitable if the neoclassical economic theories that have dominated recent US market level health care strategy research could be complemented by greater use of sociological frameworks. Sociological theory can address three central questions that neoclassical economic theories have tended to slight: (1) how decision-makers' preferences are determined; (2) who the decision-makers are; and (3) how decision-makers' plans are translated into organizational action. We suggest five sociological frameworks that would enable researchers to address these issues better relative to market level strategy in health care. The frameworks are (1) institutional theory, (2) organizational ecology, (3) social movements, (4) social networks, and (5) internal organizational change. A recent global trend toward privatization of health care provision makes US market level strategy research increasingly applicable to non-US readers. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-656
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2000

Keywords

  • Health markets
  • Health system
  • Strategy
  • US

Cite this

@article{c46cf3c3e46446849754e08f9047c9ad,
title = "A critical review of recent US market level health care strategy literature",
abstract = "In this review, we argue that it would be profitable if the neoclassical economic theories that have dominated recent US market level health care strategy research could be complemented by greater use of sociological frameworks. Sociological theory can address three central questions that neoclassical economic theories have tended to slight: (1) how decision-makers' preferences are determined; (2) who the decision-makers are; and (3) how decision-makers' plans are translated into organizational action. We suggest five sociological frameworks that would enable researchers to address these issues better relative to market level strategy in health care. The frameworks are (1) institutional theory, (2) organizational ecology, (3) social movements, (4) social networks, and (5) internal organizational change. A recent global trend toward privatization of health care provision makes US market level strategy research increasingly applicable to non-US readers. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.",
keywords = "Health markets, Health system, Strategy, US",
author = "Rebecca Wells and Jane Banaszak-Holl",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00009-5",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "639--656",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "5",

}

A critical review of recent US market level health care strategy literature. / Wells, Rebecca; Banaszak-Holl, Jane.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 5, 01.09.2000, p. 639-656.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical review of recent US market level health care strategy literature

AU - Wells, Rebecca

AU - Banaszak-Holl, Jane

PY - 2000/9/1

Y1 - 2000/9/1

N2 - In this review, we argue that it would be profitable if the neoclassical economic theories that have dominated recent US market level health care strategy research could be complemented by greater use of sociological frameworks. Sociological theory can address three central questions that neoclassical economic theories have tended to slight: (1) how decision-makers' preferences are determined; (2) who the decision-makers are; and (3) how decision-makers' plans are translated into organizational action. We suggest five sociological frameworks that would enable researchers to address these issues better relative to market level strategy in health care. The frameworks are (1) institutional theory, (2) organizational ecology, (3) social movements, (4) social networks, and (5) internal organizational change. A recent global trend toward privatization of health care provision makes US market level strategy research increasingly applicable to non-US readers. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

AB - In this review, we argue that it would be profitable if the neoclassical economic theories that have dominated recent US market level health care strategy research could be complemented by greater use of sociological frameworks. Sociological theory can address three central questions that neoclassical economic theories have tended to slight: (1) how decision-makers' preferences are determined; (2) who the decision-makers are; and (3) how decision-makers' plans are translated into organizational action. We suggest five sociological frameworks that would enable researchers to address these issues better relative to market level strategy in health care. The frameworks are (1) institutional theory, (2) organizational ecology, (3) social movements, (4) social networks, and (5) internal organizational change. A recent global trend toward privatization of health care provision makes US market level strategy research increasingly applicable to non-US readers. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

KW - Health markets

KW - Health system

KW - Strategy

KW - US

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034287013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00009-5

DO - 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00009-5

M3 - Review Article

VL - 51

SP - 639

EP - 656

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 5

ER -