A critical review of brain and cognitive reserve in Huntington's disease

Maria V. Soloveva, Sharna D. Jamadar, Govinda Poudel, Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The ‘reserve’ hypothesis posits that the brain undergoes structural and functional reorganisation to actively cope with brain damage or disease. Consistent with passive and active components of ‘reserve’ the brain moderates its biological substrates (brain reserve) and differentially changes the level of neural activity in tasks-specific networks and/or by recruiting additional non-task related brain regions (cognitive reserve) to optimise behavioural performance. How the ‘reserve’ hypothesis applies in neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease (HD) remains unknown. We postulate that unless the ‘reserve’ hypothesis is tested empirically, it is impossible to draw firm conclusions about how task-related neural activity is providing a neuroplastic change in HD and possibly other neurodegenerative disorders. We conclude that there is a pressing need to operationalise cognitive reserve, as well as incorporate different biological substrates into a model of ‘reserve’. We suggest that it is important to identify and embed potential neuroprotective modulating factors of ‘reserve’ in randomised controlled multi-domain non-pharmaceutical interventions to potentially enhance ‘reserve’ and thus preserve cognitive and psychosocial functioning in HD patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-169
Number of pages15
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume88
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • Ageing models of compensation
  • Brain and cognitive reserve
  • Functional neuroimaging
  • Huntington's disease
  • Micro- and macro-structural neuroimaging
  • Network efficiency
  • Neural compensation
  • Psychosocial modulating factors
  • The ‘reserve’ hypothesis

Cite this

@article{dcc5a98bc46b4699b825999a86bf9ba7,
title = "A critical review of brain and cognitive reserve in Huntington's disease",
abstract = "The ‘reserve’ hypothesis posits that the brain undergoes structural and functional reorganisation to actively cope with brain damage or disease. Consistent with passive and active components of ‘reserve’ the brain moderates its biological substrates (brain reserve) and differentially changes the level of neural activity in tasks-specific networks and/or by recruiting additional non-task related brain regions (cognitive reserve) to optimise behavioural performance. How the ‘reserve’ hypothesis applies in neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease (HD) remains unknown. We postulate that unless the ‘reserve’ hypothesis is tested empirically, it is impossible to draw firm conclusions about how task-related neural activity is providing a neuroplastic change in HD and possibly other neurodegenerative disorders. We conclude that there is a pressing need to operationalise cognitive reserve, as well as incorporate different biological substrates into a model of ‘reserve’. We suggest that it is important to identify and embed potential neuroprotective modulating factors of ‘reserve’ in randomised controlled multi-domain non-pharmaceutical interventions to potentially enhance ‘reserve’ and thus preserve cognitive and psychosocial functioning in HD patients.",
keywords = "Ageing models of compensation, Brain and cognitive reserve, Functional neuroimaging, Huntington's disease, Micro- and macro-structural neuroimaging, Network efficiency, Neural compensation, Psychosocial modulating factors, The ‘reserve’ hypothesis",
author = "Soloveva, {Maria V.} and Jamadar, {Sharna D.} and Govinda Poudel and Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.003",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "155--169",
journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
issn = "0149-7634",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A critical review of brain and cognitive reserve in Huntington's disease. / Soloveva, Maria V.; Jamadar, Sharna D.; Poudel, Govinda; Georgiou-Karistianis, Nellie.

In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 88, 01.05.2018, p. 155-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical review of brain and cognitive reserve in Huntington's disease

AU - Soloveva, Maria V.

AU - Jamadar, Sharna D.

AU - Poudel, Govinda

AU - Georgiou-Karistianis, Nellie

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - The ‘reserve’ hypothesis posits that the brain undergoes structural and functional reorganisation to actively cope with brain damage or disease. Consistent with passive and active components of ‘reserve’ the brain moderates its biological substrates (brain reserve) and differentially changes the level of neural activity in tasks-specific networks and/or by recruiting additional non-task related brain regions (cognitive reserve) to optimise behavioural performance. How the ‘reserve’ hypothesis applies in neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease (HD) remains unknown. We postulate that unless the ‘reserve’ hypothesis is tested empirically, it is impossible to draw firm conclusions about how task-related neural activity is providing a neuroplastic change in HD and possibly other neurodegenerative disorders. We conclude that there is a pressing need to operationalise cognitive reserve, as well as incorporate different biological substrates into a model of ‘reserve’. We suggest that it is important to identify and embed potential neuroprotective modulating factors of ‘reserve’ in randomised controlled multi-domain non-pharmaceutical interventions to potentially enhance ‘reserve’ and thus preserve cognitive and psychosocial functioning in HD patients.

AB - The ‘reserve’ hypothesis posits that the brain undergoes structural and functional reorganisation to actively cope with brain damage or disease. Consistent with passive and active components of ‘reserve’ the brain moderates its biological substrates (brain reserve) and differentially changes the level of neural activity in tasks-specific networks and/or by recruiting additional non-task related brain regions (cognitive reserve) to optimise behavioural performance. How the ‘reserve’ hypothesis applies in neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease (HD) remains unknown. We postulate that unless the ‘reserve’ hypothesis is tested empirically, it is impossible to draw firm conclusions about how task-related neural activity is providing a neuroplastic change in HD and possibly other neurodegenerative disorders. We conclude that there is a pressing need to operationalise cognitive reserve, as well as incorporate different biological substrates into a model of ‘reserve’. We suggest that it is important to identify and embed potential neuroprotective modulating factors of ‘reserve’ in randomised controlled multi-domain non-pharmaceutical interventions to potentially enhance ‘reserve’ and thus preserve cognitive and psychosocial functioning in HD patients.

KW - Ageing models of compensation

KW - Brain and cognitive reserve

KW - Functional neuroimaging

KW - Huntington's disease

KW - Micro- and macro-structural neuroimaging

KW - Network efficiency

KW - Neural compensation

KW - Psychosocial modulating factors

KW - The ‘reserve’ hypothesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044132563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.003

M3 - Review Article

VL - 88

SP - 155

EP - 169

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

SN - 0149-7634

ER -