Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2019 |
| Event | Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Conference 2019: Justice Reimagined - Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre, Perth, Australia Duration: 10 Dec 2019 → 13 Dec 2019 http://anzsocconference.com.au/ |
Conference
| Conference | Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Conference 2019 |
|---|---|
| Country | Australia |
| City | Perth |
| Period | 10/12/19 → 13/12/19 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- youth justice
- giving voice
- methodology
- Ethical research
- reflexivity
- critical pragmatism
Cite this
}
A critical reflection on ‘giving voice’ to justice-involved young people. / Turner, Shelley.
2019. Abstract from Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Conference 2019, Perth, Australia.Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › Other › peer-review
TY - CONF
T1 - A critical reflection on ‘giving voice’ to justice-involved young people
AU - Turner, Shelley
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Directly including justice-involved children and young people in research emphasises that they are worthy of being listened to and may help counter the silencing of their voices once they become mandated clients of the state (Naylor 2015). Young people’s accounts of their experiences in the youth justice system may also serve to ‘humanise’ these for others, and provide new and unique insights for policy and practice (Drake, Fergusson & Briggs 2014; Barry 2006, 2009, 2013). It can also be an important avenue through which to help realise the intentions of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989; for children to express their views about matters that pertain to them and for these views to be considered by decision-makers (Wilson & Wilks 2013). However, for researchers who want to work with justice-involved young people, the interface between the concurrent social labels of ‘young person’ and ‘offender’, presents some unique and specific challenges (Holt and Pamment 2011). Yet, there is very little in the literature about how to manage the methodological, ethical and practical challenges of trying to ‘give voice’ to the experiences of justice-involved young people. This paper discusses some key challenges faced by the researcher in a study that tries to privilege the voices and perspectives of justice-involved young people and a critical examination of the responses taken to these issues.
AB - Directly including justice-involved children and young people in research emphasises that they are worthy of being listened to and may help counter the silencing of their voices once they become mandated clients of the state (Naylor 2015). Young people’s accounts of their experiences in the youth justice system may also serve to ‘humanise’ these for others, and provide new and unique insights for policy and practice (Drake, Fergusson & Briggs 2014; Barry 2006, 2009, 2013). It can also be an important avenue through which to help realise the intentions of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989; for children to express their views about matters that pertain to them and for these views to be considered by decision-makers (Wilson & Wilks 2013). However, for researchers who want to work with justice-involved young people, the interface between the concurrent social labels of ‘young person’ and ‘offender’, presents some unique and specific challenges (Holt and Pamment 2011). Yet, there is very little in the literature about how to manage the methodological, ethical and practical challenges of trying to ‘give voice’ to the experiences of justice-involved young people. This paper discusses some key challenges faced by the researcher in a study that tries to privilege the voices and perspectives of justice-involved young people and a critical examination of the responses taken to these issues.
KW - youth justice
KW - giving voice
KW - methodology
KW - Ethical research
KW - reflexivity
KW - critical pragmatism
M3 - Abstract
ER -