A comparison of two malnutrition screening tools in acute medical inpatients and validation of a screening tool among adult Indigenous Australian patients

Natasha F Morris, Simon Stewart, Malcom D. Riley, Graeme P Maguire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify and validate a screening tool to detect malnutrition among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: This study included medical patients admitted into three regional hospitals in Australia. A literature review was undertaken of current screening tools before the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and the newly developed Adult Nutrition Tool (ANT) were used to validate a screening tool for use among participants against the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tool. The sensitivity and specificity of both the MST and ANT were determined for all study participants as well as according to participants' Indigenous status. RESULTS: A total of 608 participants were enrolled into the study, of whom 271 (44.6%) were Indigenous. The area under the curve (AUC) when utilising ANT was higher in all participants compared to the MST (0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92 versus 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.84, p<0.001). The AUC was also significantly higher for Indigenous participants when utilising ANT compared to the MST (0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92 versus 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.83, p<0.001). An ANT >=2 demonstrated superior sensitivity for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants (96.0%, 95% CI 92.8-98.7%) than the MST (84.0%, 95% CI 78.9-88.3) but with inferior specificity (59.5%, 95% CI 54.2-64.6) than the MST (70.7%, 95% CI 65.7-75.3). CONCLUSIONS: The ANT is both a valid and accurate tool for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. Further research is required to validate ANT to aide in the detection of malnutrition in other clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1198-1206
Number of pages9
JournalAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Keywords

  • adult nutrition tool
  • Indigenous Australian patients
  • malnutrition screening tool
  • subjective global assessment
  • validation

Cite this

@article{4e56669e4fdc4587ba0eb6a3e9d0bd69,
title = "A comparison of two malnutrition screening tools in acute medical inpatients and validation of a screening tool among adult Indigenous Australian patients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify and validate a screening tool to detect malnutrition among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: This study included medical patients admitted into three regional hospitals in Australia. A literature review was undertaken of current screening tools before the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and the newly developed Adult Nutrition Tool (ANT) were used to validate a screening tool for use among participants against the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tool. The sensitivity and specificity of both the MST and ANT were determined for all study participants as well as according to participants' Indigenous status. RESULTS: A total of 608 participants were enrolled into the study, of whom 271 (44.6{\%}) were Indigenous. The area under the curve (AUC) when utilising ANT was higher in all participants compared to the MST (0.90, 95{\%} CI 0.88-0.92 versus 0.81, 95{\%} CI 0.77-0.84, p<0.001). The AUC was also significantly higher for Indigenous participants when utilising ANT compared to the MST (0.88, 95{\%} CI 0.84-0.92 versus 0.78, 95{\%} CI 0.73-0.83, p<0.001). An ANT >=2 demonstrated superior sensitivity for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants (96.0{\%}, 95{\%} CI 92.8-98.7{\%}) than the MST (84.0{\%}, 95{\%} CI 78.9-88.3) but with inferior specificity (59.5{\%}, 95{\%} CI 54.2-64.6) than the MST (70.7{\%}, 95{\%} CI 65.7-75.3). CONCLUSIONS: The ANT is both a valid and accurate tool for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. Further research is required to validate ANT to aide in the detection of malnutrition in other clinical settings.",
keywords = "adult nutrition tool, Indigenous Australian patients, malnutrition screening tool, subjective global assessment, validation",
author = "Morris, {Natasha F} and Simon Stewart and Riley, {Malcom D.} and Maguire, {Graeme P}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0005",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1198--1206",
journal = "Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition",
issn = "0964-7058",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

A comparison of two malnutrition screening tools in acute medical inpatients and validation of a screening tool among adult Indigenous Australian patients. / Morris, Natasha F; Stewart, Simon; Riley, Malcom D.; Maguire, Graeme P.

In: Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, Vol. 27, No. 6, 11.2018, p. 1198-1206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of two malnutrition screening tools in acute medical inpatients and validation of a screening tool among adult Indigenous Australian patients

AU - Morris, Natasha F

AU - Stewart, Simon

AU - Riley, Malcom D.

AU - Maguire, Graeme P

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify and validate a screening tool to detect malnutrition among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: This study included medical patients admitted into three regional hospitals in Australia. A literature review was undertaken of current screening tools before the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and the newly developed Adult Nutrition Tool (ANT) were used to validate a screening tool for use among participants against the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tool. The sensitivity and specificity of both the MST and ANT were determined for all study participants as well as according to participants' Indigenous status. RESULTS: A total of 608 participants were enrolled into the study, of whom 271 (44.6%) were Indigenous. The area under the curve (AUC) when utilising ANT was higher in all participants compared to the MST (0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92 versus 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.84, p<0.001). The AUC was also significantly higher for Indigenous participants when utilising ANT compared to the MST (0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92 versus 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.83, p<0.001). An ANT >=2 demonstrated superior sensitivity for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants (96.0%, 95% CI 92.8-98.7%) than the MST (84.0%, 95% CI 78.9-88.3) but with inferior specificity (59.5%, 95% CI 54.2-64.6) than the MST (70.7%, 95% CI 65.7-75.3). CONCLUSIONS: The ANT is both a valid and accurate tool for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. Further research is required to validate ANT to aide in the detection of malnutrition in other clinical settings.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify and validate a screening tool to detect malnutrition among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: This study included medical patients admitted into three regional hospitals in Australia. A literature review was undertaken of current screening tools before the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and the newly developed Adult Nutrition Tool (ANT) were used to validate a screening tool for use among participants against the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tool. The sensitivity and specificity of both the MST and ANT were determined for all study participants as well as according to participants' Indigenous status. RESULTS: A total of 608 participants were enrolled into the study, of whom 271 (44.6%) were Indigenous. The area under the curve (AUC) when utilising ANT was higher in all participants compared to the MST (0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92 versus 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.84, p<0.001). The AUC was also significantly higher for Indigenous participants when utilising ANT compared to the MST (0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92 versus 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.83, p<0.001). An ANT >=2 demonstrated superior sensitivity for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants (96.0%, 95% CI 92.8-98.7%) than the MST (84.0%, 95% CI 78.9-88.3) but with inferior specificity (59.5%, 95% CI 54.2-64.6) than the MST (70.7%, 95% CI 65.7-75.3). CONCLUSIONS: The ANT is both a valid and accurate tool for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients. Further research is required to validate ANT to aide in the detection of malnutrition in other clinical settings.

KW - adult nutrition tool

KW - Indigenous Australian patients

KW - malnutrition screening tool

KW - subjective global assessment

KW - validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057570424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0005

DO - 10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0005

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1198

EP - 1206

JO - Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition

JF - Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition

SN - 0964-7058

IS - 6

ER -