TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative study of the role of Ag in microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg-Gd and Mg-Y alloys
AU - Zhang, Yu
AU - Rong, Wei
AU - Wu, Yujuan
AU - Peng, Liming
AU - Nie, Jian-Feng
AU - Birbilis, Nick
PY - 2018/7/25
Y1 - 2018/7/25
N2 - Mg-Gd and Mg-Y are two fundamental Mg alloy systems. Four alloys with a equi-concentration of total alloying elements: Mg-2.8Gd-0.1Zr (at%), Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr (at%), Mg-2.8Y-0.1Zr (at%) and Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr (at%) were designed. The roles of Ag in the Mg-Gd and Mg-Y alloys were comparatively studied. The Ag addition enhances the age-hardening response of the Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr due to a combined strengthening effect of the prismatic β′ and basal γ′′ precipitates. In contrast, the Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr exhibits a weakened age-hardening response in comparison with the Mg-2.8Y-0.1Zr, which is due to the formation of the basal γ′′ precipitates at the expense of the prismatic β′ precipitates. The Ag addition also promotes the formation of precipitation free zones (PFZs) along grain boundaries in both Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr and Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr. The grain boundary PFZ is supposed to relax stress concentration to some extent during plastic deformation, which is beneficial to ductility. In summary, the Ag addition not only improves the tensile yield strength (YS) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS), but also improves the elongation of the Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr. In comparison, the Ag addition in the Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr improves the UTS and elongation but reduces the YS in comparison with the Mg-2.8Y-0.1Zr. The results in this study suggest that Ag is more effective to strengthen Mg-Gd than Mg-Y alloys.
AB - Mg-Gd and Mg-Y are two fundamental Mg alloy systems. Four alloys with a equi-concentration of total alloying elements: Mg-2.8Gd-0.1Zr (at%), Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr (at%), Mg-2.8Y-0.1Zr (at%) and Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr (at%) were designed. The roles of Ag in the Mg-Gd and Mg-Y alloys were comparatively studied. The Ag addition enhances the age-hardening response of the Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr due to a combined strengthening effect of the prismatic β′ and basal γ′′ precipitates. In contrast, the Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr exhibits a weakened age-hardening response in comparison with the Mg-2.8Y-0.1Zr, which is due to the formation of the basal γ′′ precipitates at the expense of the prismatic β′ precipitates. The Ag addition also promotes the formation of precipitation free zones (PFZs) along grain boundaries in both Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr and Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr. The grain boundary PFZ is supposed to relax stress concentration to some extent during plastic deformation, which is beneficial to ductility. In summary, the Ag addition not only improves the tensile yield strength (YS) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS), but also improves the elongation of the Mg-2.4Gd-0.4Ag-0.1Zr. In comparison, the Ag addition in the Mg-2.4Y-0.4Ag-0.1Zr improves the UTS and elongation but reduces the YS in comparison with the Mg-2.8Y-0.1Zr. The results in this study suggest that Ag is more effective to strengthen Mg-Gd than Mg-Y alloys.
KW - Fracture
KW - HAADF-STEM
KW - Mechanical properties
KW - Mg alloys
KW - Precipitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049304487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.084
DO - 10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.084
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049304487
SN - 0921-5093
VL - 731
SP - 609
EP - 622
JO - Materials Science and Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
JF - Materials Science and Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
ER -