A comparative study of the group runs and side sensitive group runs control charts

S. Y. Yew; M. B.C. Khoo; W. L. Teoh; S. Y. Teh; W. C. Yeong

A comparative study of the group runs and side sensitive group runs control charts

S. Y. Yew
, M. B.C. Khoo
, W. L. Teoh
, S. Y. Teh
, W. C. Yeong

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

The Group Runs (GR) and Side Sensitive Group Runs (SSGR) control charts are the improvement of the synthetic chart without and with side sensitivity. Both the SSGR and GR charts are effective for detecting small to moderate process mean shifts. The performances of the SSGR and GR charts, in terms of the average time to signal (ATS), are compared in this paper. In this comparative study, the Monte Carlo simulation approach by means of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software is used to compute the ATS values for the GR and SSGR charts. The results revealed that the SSGR chart’s performance is better than that of the GR chart for all levels of mean shifts.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	177-189
Number of pages	13
Journal	Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
Volume	24
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - Jan 2016
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Average time to signal
GR chart
SSGR chart

Cite this

@article{7c640f6477b646d5a64dc2a664ee1486,

title = "A comparative study of the group runs and side sensitive group runs control charts",

abstract = "The Group Runs (GR) and Side Sensitive Group Runs (SSGR) control charts are the improvement of the synthetic chart without and with side sensitivity. Both the SSGR and GR charts are effective for detecting small to moderate process mean shifts. The performances of the SSGR and GR charts, in terms of the average time to signal (ATS), are compared in this paper. In this comparative study, the Monte Carlo simulation approach by means of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software is used to compute the ATS values for the GR and SSGR charts. The results revealed that the SSGR chart{\textquoteright}s performance is better than that of the GR chart for all levels of mean shifts.",

keywords = "Average time to signal, GR chart, SSGR chart",

author = "Yew, \{S. Y.\} and Khoo, \{M. B.C.\} and Teoh, \{W. L.\} and Teh, \{S. Y.\} and Yeong, \{W. C.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "177--189",

journal = "Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology",

issn = "0128-7680",

publisher = "Universiti Putra Malaysia",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of the group runs and side sensitive group runs control charts

AU - Yew, S. Y.

AU - Khoo, M. B.C.

AU - Teoh, W. L.

AU - Teh, S. Y.

AU - Yeong, W. C.

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - The Group Runs (GR) and Side Sensitive Group Runs (SSGR) control charts are the improvement of the synthetic chart without and with side sensitivity. Both the SSGR and GR charts are effective for detecting small to moderate process mean shifts. The performances of the SSGR and GR charts, in terms of the average time to signal (ATS), are compared in this paper. In this comparative study, the Monte Carlo simulation approach by means of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software is used to compute the ATS values for the GR and SSGR charts. The results revealed that the SSGR chart’s performance is better than that of the GR chart for all levels of mean shifts.

AB - The Group Runs (GR) and Side Sensitive Group Runs (SSGR) control charts are the improvement of the synthetic chart without and with side sensitivity. Both the SSGR and GR charts are effective for detecting small to moderate process mean shifts. The performances of the SSGR and GR charts, in terms of the average time to signal (ATS), are compared in this paper. In this comparative study, the Monte Carlo simulation approach by means of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software is used to compute the ATS values for the GR and SSGR charts. The results revealed that the SSGR chart’s performance is better than that of the GR chart for all levels of mean shifts.

KW - Average time to signal

KW - GR chart

KW - SSGR chart

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84953870976

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953870976

SN - 0128-7680

VL - 24

SP - 177

EP - 189

JO - Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology

JF - Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology

IS - 1

ER -

A comparative study of the group runs and side sensitive group runs control charts

Abstract

Keywords

Other files and links

Cite this