A comparative study of HR involvement in strategic decision-making in China and Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to address gaps in the knowledge about human resource (HR) professional involvement in strategic decision-making in China compared with that in Australia. Design/methodology/approach: First, the authors compare the strategic involvement of Chinese and Australian HR professionals. Second, based on the upper echelon theory, the authors compare the impact of chief executive officer (CEO) and top management team (TMT) between both countries on HR involvement in strategic decision-making. Data were collected from matched pairs of HR and TMT executives in China (n = 168) and in Australia (n = 102). Findings: Results indicate a difference, despite of no statistical significance, in HR involvement in strategic decision-making between Chinese and Australian samples. TMT behavioural integration was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in a collectivistic culture (i.e. in China), but not in an individualistic culture (i.e. in Australia). However, CEO support for HRM was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in Australia, whereas it is not related in China. Originality/value: The paper conducts a comparative study and practical, and research implications are discussed at the end.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)258-275
Number of pages18
JournalChinese Management Studies
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Australia
  • CEO support for HRM
  • China
  • Comparative HRM
  • Strategic HRM
  • Top management team

Cite this

@article{59e4225157b9405cbeee701e09df0c99,
title = "A comparative study of HR involvement in strategic decision-making in China and Australia",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to address gaps in the knowledge about human resource (HR) professional involvement in strategic decision-making in China compared with that in Australia. Design/methodology/approach: First, the authors compare the strategic involvement of Chinese and Australian HR professionals. Second, based on the upper echelon theory, the authors compare the impact of chief executive officer (CEO) and top management team (TMT) between both countries on HR involvement in strategic decision-making. Data were collected from matched pairs of HR and TMT executives in China (n = 168) and in Australia (n = 102). Findings: Results indicate a difference, despite of no statistical significance, in HR involvement in strategic decision-making between Chinese and Australian samples. TMT behavioural integration was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in a collectivistic culture (i.e. in China), but not in an individualistic culture (i.e. in Australia). However, CEO support for HRM was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in Australia, whereas it is not related in China. Originality/value: The paper conducts a comparative study and practical, and research implications are discussed at the end.",
keywords = "Australia, CEO support for HRM, China, Comparative HRM, Strategic HRM, Top management team",
author = "Shuming Zhao and Cathy Sheehan and {De Cieri}, Helen and Brian Cooper",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1108/CMS-08-2018-0643",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "258--275",
journal = "Chinese Management Studies",
issn = "1750-614X",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

A comparative study of HR involvement in strategic decision-making in China and Australia. / Zhao, Shuming; Sheehan, Cathy; De Cieri, Helen; Cooper, Brian.

In: Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2019, p. 258-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of HR involvement in strategic decision-making in China and Australia

AU - Zhao, Shuming

AU - Sheehan, Cathy

AU - De Cieri, Helen

AU - Cooper, Brian

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to address gaps in the knowledge about human resource (HR) professional involvement in strategic decision-making in China compared with that in Australia. Design/methodology/approach: First, the authors compare the strategic involvement of Chinese and Australian HR professionals. Second, based on the upper echelon theory, the authors compare the impact of chief executive officer (CEO) and top management team (TMT) between both countries on HR involvement in strategic decision-making. Data were collected from matched pairs of HR and TMT executives in China (n = 168) and in Australia (n = 102). Findings: Results indicate a difference, despite of no statistical significance, in HR involvement in strategic decision-making between Chinese and Australian samples. TMT behavioural integration was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in a collectivistic culture (i.e. in China), but not in an individualistic culture (i.e. in Australia). However, CEO support for HRM was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in Australia, whereas it is not related in China. Originality/value: The paper conducts a comparative study and practical, and research implications are discussed at the end.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to address gaps in the knowledge about human resource (HR) professional involvement in strategic decision-making in China compared with that in Australia. Design/methodology/approach: First, the authors compare the strategic involvement of Chinese and Australian HR professionals. Second, based on the upper echelon theory, the authors compare the impact of chief executive officer (CEO) and top management team (TMT) between both countries on HR involvement in strategic decision-making. Data were collected from matched pairs of HR and TMT executives in China (n = 168) and in Australia (n = 102). Findings: Results indicate a difference, despite of no statistical significance, in HR involvement in strategic decision-making between Chinese and Australian samples. TMT behavioural integration was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in a collectivistic culture (i.e. in China), but not in an individualistic culture (i.e. in Australia). However, CEO support for HRM was positively related to HR involvement in strategic decision-making in Australia, whereas it is not related in China. Originality/value: The paper conducts a comparative study and practical, and research implications are discussed at the end.

KW - Australia

KW - CEO support for HRM

KW - China

KW - Comparative HRM

KW - Strategic HRM

KW - Top management team

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060147362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/CMS-08-2018-0643

DO - 10.1108/CMS-08-2018-0643

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 258

EP - 275

JO - Chinese Management Studies

JF - Chinese Management Studies

SN - 1750-614X

IS - 2

ER -