Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

6-month clinical outcomes following implantation of the bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold in vessels smaller or larger than 2.5 mm

  • Roberto Diletti
  • , Yoshinobu Onuma
  • , Vasim Farooq
  • , Josep Gomez
  • , Salvatore Brugaletta
  • , Robert-Jan van Geuns
  • , Evelyn Regar
  • , Bernard de Bruyne
  • , Dariusz Dudek
  • , Leif Thuesen
  • , Bernard Chevalier
  • , Dougal McClean
  • , Stephan Windecker
  • , Robert Whitbourn
  • , Pieter Smits
  • , Jacques Koolen
  • , Ian Meredith
  • , Dong Li
  • , Susan Veldhof
  • , Richard Rapoza
  • Hector Garcia-Garcia, John Ormiston, Patrick Serruys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the 6-month clinical outcomes after implantation of second-generation 3.0-mm bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds (BVS) in small coronary vessels (/=2.5 mm. The composite endpoint of ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac events, defined as ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, or cardiac death, was assessed. Of the 45 patients scheduled for 6-month coronary angiography, 42 patients had the procedure performed, with intravascular ultrasound undertaken in 40 of these patients. RESULTS: At 6 months, no significant differences in ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac events (3 of 41 [7.3 cases vs. 2 of 60 [3.3 cases; p = 0.3933) were observed in the small- and large-vessel groups, respectively. No cardiac deaths or episodes of in-scaffold thromboses were seen. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up demonstrated no differences in late lumen loss (0.16 +/- 0.18 mm vs. 0.21 +/- 0.17 mm; p = 0.3525) or percentage lumen area stenosis (17.6 +/- 6.0 vs. 19.8 +/- 8.5 ; p = 0.3643). CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation 3.0-mm BVS appears to be safe in small vessels, with similar clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with those of large vessels.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)258 - 264
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this