Niaz Asadullah of Monash University Malaysia said if flexibility applied to existing contributions, independent of new contributions, “the added flexibility will do more harm than good”.
However, the third account would not harm a contributor’s savings and might even increase it, if implemented with additional contributions.
The provisions for flexibility could then potentially help EPF attract new members and broaden its customer base, he said.
He said self-employed individuals or those in irregular jobs with unstable but high earnings might benefit from flexibility.
“But many others with low income are vulnerable to temptations and overspending. For this group, commitment savings instead of flexible products are appropriate.”
The government’s intention of introducing a third EPF account was announced last week by deputy finance minister Ahmad Maslan. He said details would be announced later.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently said that 6.3 million EPF members have less than RM10,000 in their EPF savings, which would provide them with a projected retirement income of less than RM42 per month over 20 years.
Niaz said if the current median savings of EPF members could be doubled, the government could recover the RM145 billion lost in retirement savings during the Covid-19 pandemic.
“But this requires additional measures beyond the flexible third account,” he said.
This strategy aimed to potentially increase the investment returns for this group and, in turn, enhance their capacity to save, he said.
Niaz advocated for innovations in existing retirement saving schemes, such as i-Saraan and i-Suri.
He said women, especially those with lower wages and less control over their income, needed tailored strategies such as locked savings for housewives, and a mix of flexible and fixed accounts for working single mothers