Aviation academic: I wouldn’t ride a 737 MAX no matter what Boeing says

Press/Media: Expert Comment

Period15 Nov 2019

Media contributions

1

Media contributions

  • TitleAviation academic: I wouldn’t ride a 737 MAX no matter what Boeing says
    Media name/outletThe New Daily
    CountryAustralia
    Date15/11/19
    DescriptionMonash University aviation expert and co-author of "Up in the Air" Greg Bamber said that he would not feel safe flying on the 737 MAX under current circumstances. “I would not be getting on one at the moment,” Professor Bamber said. “Boeing has made several earlier forecasts of the planes being back in the air very soon which it did not keep. “I think there’s a lot of ground still to cover.”

    Boeing’s behaviour has created a “trust deficit”, Professor Bamber said. “They are saying that the first people that will be flying on these planes will be Boeing executives and airline executives, and they will be on a big push to try to reassure the public and on a charm offensive to convince people to trust Boeing again,” he said.

    He outlined two ongoing areas of concern. The first is the technical issue of fixing the fault with the 737 MAX planes – the MCAS system, which was designed to prevent the plane stalling, but was not disclosed to pilots – and led to the Lion Air and Ethiopian Air tragedies. Boeing misled both “the airlines it was selling these planes to”, and the pilots, by not disclosing the new MCAS system and putting it in their manuals, Professor Bamber said.

    “Boeing did this for commercial reasons, putting profits before people. They wanted to pretend that the Boeing 737 MAX 8 was not a new aircraft on a new system, and they wanted to persuade airlines to buy it on the grounds that pilots wouldn’t need new training,” he said. “Just fixing the technical issue is one thing … but once that’s done and the regulators are convinced that has been done, it is then going to be necessary to try to fix the trust deficit and retrain the pilots and convince the travelling public that the planes are safe.”

    The second issue is that the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) in the United States allowed Boeing to act with little oversight and “almost self-regulate”, Professor Bamber said. “The FAA In the US is also to some extent at fault here,” he said. “The primary fault is with Boeing, but the American authority had been captured by Boeing. The FAA allowed Boeing to almost self-regulate.”

    Boeing has a “major challenge ahead”, Professor Bamber said. “Even if the FAA does reverse the grounding its likely that other regulators in Australia, Asia, and Europe, won’t necessarily follow suit any longer. “They will want to take time to do their own investigations because they now have a trust deficit with the FAA.”
    Producer/AuthorIsabelle Lane
    URLhttps://thenewdaily.com.au/life/travel/2019/11/15/boeing-737-max-safety/
    PersonsGreg Bamber

Keywords

  • Airlines
  • Boeing
  • Southwest Airlines
  • Pilots union
  • 737 MAX jets
  • Ethiopian Airlines crash
  • Lion Air crash
  • Aviation
  • MCAS system
  • aircraft
  • pilots
  • Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)
  • Regulation
  • Regulators
  • Aviation engineers’ union