Description
Myths of non-routinely armed policingHistorically, the rate of officer involved shootings in New Zealand has been lower than the rate of officer involved shootings in Australia. This has, in part, been understood as a function of New Zealand Police retaining a non-routinely armed status while Australian police agencies have progressively become routinely armed with firearms. This assumption is tested through a comparison of officer involved shootings in Australia, England and Wales, and New Zealand over a 50-year period (1971-2020). However, the present research identifies that in the past decade, the rate of officer involved shootings in New Zealand has surpassed that of Australia. Comparing how operational police firearms policies in Australia, England and Wales, and New Zealand coalesce with changes in the rate of shootings, this paper provides an opportunity to consider the efficacy of the binary routinely armed / non- routinely armed paradigm.
Period | 8 Sept 2023 |
---|---|
Event type | Conference |
Location | Florence, ItalyShow on map |
Degree of Recognition | International |
Related content
-
Outputs
-
Police shootings in New Zealand and England and Wales: a cross-national comparison
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
-
The myth of 'routinely unarmed' policing
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (Book) › Research › peer-review
-
Projects
-
Police Shootings - routinely armed and unarmed police agencies
Project: Research